Waiting for Summer

Waiting for Summer
Showing posts with label Andreas Gursky. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andreas Gursky. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 November 2014

Constructing Worlds: Photography and Architecture in the Modern Age

I went to the Constructing Worlds: Photography and Architecture in the Modern Age exhibition last night at the Barbican.  I went as it was an opportunity to meet up with my friend Gill Golding who is an urban visualisation photographer.  I'm not particularly interested in architecture, but I am interested in seeing how people live and how they interact with space, culture and anthropology.  But, thanks to Gill explaining things as we walked around (which completely changed the whole experience from knowing nothing to being informed about what I was looking at!), I now have a much greater appreciation of architecture as art and its relationship with photography and space.

So what was the exhibition like?  Actually, it was great and there was a lot to see.  It had been extremely well curated and followed a logical and (mostly) chronological sequence from 1930s to the present day, and there were some very interesting contrasts and juxtapositions, both within each photographer's series, and in between photographers.

The real highlight for me was the work by Nadav Kander who had images from two series on display taken in the 2000s: Chongqing Municipality and Hubei Province.  I found the Chongqing Municipality in particular an astonishing set of images.  Amazingly gentle exposures in contrast to the ugly constructions depicting life by a polluted river.  In Chongqing IV (Sunday Picnic) a family are having a picnic by the water's edge; they all look to be enjoying themselves with the exception of one person set apart from the main group who is glaring at the camera.  The construction of this image is beautiful; the eye takes you from the family through the bridge supports to the back of the image where everything is soft and delicate despite being ugly and industrial looking.  In Chongqing XI, there is the same soft exposure, but the scene looks very polluted; a lady is wearing a face mask, yet people are fishing in the river.   A delicate scene showing vast spaces, yet with an enormous bridge construction going on in the background.  Huge photographs showing huge ideas!

More about Nadav Kandar is available from Sean O'Hagen's review in The Guardian from 20 October 2010. 

Of the other photographers displayed, I have made some notes and asked a few questions:
  • Berenice Abbott
    • 1930s New York images showing the contrast between poverty and power, old and new, extreme height vs ground level, social change, grid structures, unemployment, American economy, industrial development (cars / bridges)
  • Iwan Baan
    • Scenes captured in 2000s of Torre David in Venezuela depicting an interesting and normal life of the building's infamous squatters: parties, balloons, barbers, dogs.  Nice perspectives but I prefer significantly the visualisation of this community by Alejandro Cegarra.
  • Bernd and Hilla Becher
    • I loved these images.  Documented over five decades, a showcase of twenty one water towers showing a variety of architectural styles, with consistent vertical and central framing and soft monochrome mid-tones.  The positioning of the foreground made me feel that I could walk into the images and in to the towers!  (Some of the towers looked like weird space craft).  This series reminded me of the Israeli Watchtowers body of work by Taysir Batniji.
  • Hélène Binet
    • Taken in 1990s of the Jewish Museum in Berlin, these were beautiful abstracts of light and shade, again with strong graphical shapes, but showing a great sensitivity.
  • Walker Evans
    • 1930s images from America's "Deep South", also showing social change but behind that of New York shown by Berenice Abbott.  I wondered if the Frame Houses from New Orleans are still there post Hurricane Katrina.  Evans images gave an insight into the daily life of the inhabitants, the simplicity of their religion (i.e. very simple and humble structured churches unlike other religions), and the shocking nature of terminology like "Negro Housing" showing that segregation was still an aspect of life back then.  I was particularly struck by the image of Floyd Burroughs and his very striking eyes.  It reminded me of the Afghan Girl image by Steve McCurry (in Portraits) - a worn and tired face, but piercing eyes looking straight through you.
  • Luigi Ghirri
    • 1980s images of a cemetery which to me seemed more like a storage unit or even a prison BUT these images were made beautiful by the presence of squares of light in each image.  I really liked the abstract and graphic shape design of the images.
  • Andreas Gursky
    • What can you say about Gursky that hasn't already been said?  Enormous and strange (altered reality) but interesting!
  • Lucien Hervé
    • 1950s images of concrete and boxes, which seems strange given the heritage and beautiful architecture of the location of the architecture (India), but when you realise how the light interacts with the buildings, you understand that in actual fact, the architecture is a canvas for the light creating beautiful abstract scenes of light and shade.
  • Nadav Kander
    • (see above)
  • Luisa Lambri
    • I didn't get these series from 2000s.  One abstract is nice, but why four that all look the same?
  • Simon Norfolk
    • Shot over the past 15 years or so, these images of Afghanistan and Bagdad are very interesting showing the post-war effects, and the incongruence between modern life and a war-ravaged scene.  Glimpses of a modern life inherited from the very regime (the West) these locations were at war with.
  • Bas Princen
    • Princen's images were fascinating.  Taken in 2009, Princen shows five different cities in such a way that the context is altered - showing the urban structures in semi-urban spaces.  In Cairo for instance, which essentially shows how the space of an urban wasteland has been used, there is so much to see.  You begin by feeling overwhelmed, not knowing where to look first.  Finally you focus on the distant and soft buildings in the horizon searching for an anchor, somewhere to start.  Then you start to notice details: animals on rooftops, people sifting through rubbish, laundry drying, satellite TV discs (modern poverty), there is just so much to see.  In Istanbul, there is a real juxtaposition of old vs new, straight vs muddled, again lots to look at.  In Dubai, a beautiful, yet absurd black dominant structure and then workers around it all dressed in blue, reminding us of the context. In (ring-road) Cairo - very different - juxtaposition of construction yet herding animals.  Finally, in Amman - what happened?  Did the land collapse neatly at the edge of the buildings, or did they decide to construct right on the edge of a landslide?
  • Ed Ruscha
    • Aerial photographs from the USA taken in 1960s, showing enormous spaces and what shapes look like from a height - you would never appreciate this driving around at ground level!
  • Stephen Shore
    • 1970s images of everyday USA scenes, except that to me, these look like TV sets, open air museums - almost "Toy Town" like structures.  But as the exhibition progresses, it seems like we are moving more into a civilisation that we recognise.
  • Julius Shulman
    • 1960s images of case study houses and in particular #22 - a very strange set of images.  For a start the people in the images look like "Stepford Wives" characters!  None of them are looking at the camera - they appear to be the American idea of the perfect couple with the perfect house.  The photographs themselves are very neat - clean straight lines, right angles, sharp corners, space, balance, sparseness, steel, precision.  It seems as if the people aren't allowed to change the concept of space; even the shadows are perfectly angular!  The whole effect seemed very contrived, but what a view from #22 over Los Angeles!
  • Thomas Struth
    • Struth's collection from 2000s was a series of typical street scenes from various parts of the world.  I enjoyed looking at these - I found that by the end I was trying to guess the location before looking at the caption!  I liked the way that one photograph led to the next through use of consistency of composition and similar lines.  Strange that these streets were deserted - in some photographs - the only evidence of people is the car number plates that would be attributed to living people.  The contrast between the cities is also interesting: neat Germany, precise Tokyo, untidy Naples, historic St Petersberg, and then almost Soviet looking Geneva and Dessau, and in Pyongyang no gaps between the buildings.  These were very interesting.
  • Hiroshi Sugimoto
    • A very strange set of out of focus iconic buildings shot in 2000s, which left me cold.  Might have been better in colour maybe, but these images did nothing for me.  
  • Guy Tillim
    • A series of photographs from modern Africa shot in the 2000s; broken dreams, dull colours, depressing scences, graphic shapes, stark bareness.  Not the colourful, noisy, chaotic Africa that I've seen for myself.
 More information about each of the photographers is available from: http://www.barbican.org.uk/media/events/16264gallerytexts-updatednov2014.pdf.

Websites:

Saturday, 2 August 2014

LSP - Photojournalism and Street Photography - Day Two

Day Two (20 July) started with Holger recommending the Loupe Hoodman for viewing images on the camera, if we need to check them on the go.  I don't know if I need this really, at this stage; I tend to shoot a lot of photos to make sure I've got something, just checking for blinkies to make sure if exposure ok, and also a quick glance to see if exposure is right.  I have noticed though that you can't really see sharpness/focus very well on the screen, so this is something to bear in mind.

Our day began with a review of the Covent Garden expedition from LSP Day One.  I had a few pictures of railings and was advised that in a short photo essay to limit the type of image to just one.  I had tried to capture human form interacting with the background, but Holger thought this wasn't necessary and that shapes formed by humans are interesting enough.  He recommended looking at  Massimo Vitalli, who takes pictures of large groups of people in large format e.g. Disco, and then crops in to find little hidden stories.  Holger also suggested that in future I should be more aware of what my shots are about.  In respect of other people's contributions, he reminded us to look at crowds rather than performers and to pick out interesting reactions. 

We also spoke about Andreas Gursky and his picture Rhein II, which fetched over £2m at auction.   This is an image that is manipulated - and therefore hard to say what is true or not (we were discussing the concept of truth in photography).  I'm surprised a photograph can be this valuable, particularly one that is manipulated and can therefore be reproduced. 

The purpose of this day was to improve on our photo essay skills following the Covent Garden intro, and we were given the following pointers:
  • Don't mix black and white with colour
  • Create images that are on different levels
  • Juxtaposition can be between photos as well as within a single image
  • Realising what doesn't work is part of the creative process.
Photo essays were first popularised by Life Magazine; W. Eugene Smith was one of the most popular photo essayists (landmark photo essay Country Doctor), and then Leonard McCombe, who looked a private lives and Larry Burrows, Vietnam War photo journalist.  

(see slides for detailed structure of photo essay).

Simple structure of photo essay:
  1. Establishing Shot - wide-angle broad view - sets scene and what story is about - introduces context - introduction
  2. Portrait Shot - close up on subject or character of story
  3. Detail Shot - detail about the story or equipment - interrupts rhythm
  4. Interaction Shot - subject interacting with the environment or other people
  5. Signature Shot - gesture that sums up story - real emotion - story climax - decisive moment
Our assignment then was to go to Leicester Square and shoot some good openers or Establishing Shot.

Here are mine, with feedback below; we were reminded that this image needs to be quite general, landscape format, likely to be double page in a magazine, needs context, don't photograph people from behind, shot needs to hook viewer up immediately - should be someone the reader can relate to immediately.


1.

2.

3.

4.

  1. Window cleaner image - window cleaner is too small and photograph distracted by stuff below office block in the street.  Needs cropping to have impact (this didn't work so not loaded).
  2. Taxis are too common in London streets to really tell reader what the story would be about.  Many scenes could have London taxis in them, and not necessarily be about taxis.
  3. More interesting shot - has several layers - needs cropping and would be better if shopkeeper more visible.  Potentially tells story about someone who is trying to make a living.  Here is cropped version below.
  4. Most interesting of the four - raises questions - well composed - could make interesting story.



We then went to the British Museum to shoot a complete photo essay comprising five shots based on the structure above.  Our subject was "Tourists" This was quite hard as it was crowded and hot, plus I was so focussed on the objective, my exposure skills collapsed....(also going from dark to light frequently - forgot to change ISO) - so some of my shots are too grainy.  Here are the results I selected to present at Day Three:

1. Establishing

2. Portrait

3. Detail

4. Interaction

5. Signature
We received feedback on this assignment on Day Three as follows:
  1. Establishing: focus point is missing; agreed sets context but would be better with someone in focus in foreground that looks like a tourist
  2. Portrait: needs to be more of a classic portrait, i.e. blurred background to make the subject stand out and crop/zoom in to subject
  3. Detail: this is a portrait not detail (very good portrait) - detail should be of equipment e.g. camera, audio etc
  4. Interaction: very good
  5. Signature: not signature more portrait - too ambiguous for signature.  Signature needs to represent one moment that represents entire context (although in this case not sure what that would be...)