Waiting for Summer

Waiting for Summer
Showing posts with label Martin Parr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Parr. Show all posts

Saturday, 23 August 2014

Assignment One - Two Sides of the Story - Preparation and Execution

Assignment One asks that we choose a theme and prepare 5-7 images for each of two sets of photographs telling different versions of the same story.

23 August

For my theme, my first idea was to show life in a zoo park from two different perspectives: outsiders looking in, and animals looking out.  The idea for this has come from two different sources: firstly because I want to try out my D810 plus new lenses on animals (it has only been used for street photography so far!) and particularly to test whether the ability to handle dynamic range i.e. black creatures in midday sun, is better than the D5000 I was previously using (and for reasons of time I need to multitask!), and secondly I'm intrigued by the image taken by Count de Montizon in 1852 in London of the Hippopotamus at the Zoological Gardens, Regents Park, see Bate, 2013, p24 (which I first wrote about during Digital Photographic Practice - see here for a summary).

Bate uses the image to demonstrate the that there may be different points of view within a photograph.  In this instance, we know from our general knowledge that it is extremely likely that the hippo is the one in the cage, however, looking at the photograph, the onlookers appear to be in the cage.  There is a realism that we know to be true, and then there is doubt about where the viewer is placed, and indeed where the hippo is placed in relation to the viewer (Bate, 2013, pp37-40).  It asks the question whether humans been imprisoned by nature.

So, I'm going try to take 5-7 pairs of photographs showing the perspective of the animal, or the viewer inside the cage, looking out, and the perspective of onlookers looking in, to produce representations of the juxtapositions of these two worlds that are forced to co-exist.

I don't know yet whether these will be colour or black and white, or square or rectangle format.  Being right-brained, I will decide later!  A lot will depend on the lighting, background detail, what stands out.  I suspect the outcome will be colour and rectangle landscapes, but we will see.

24 August
So I tried to put my idea into practice at Drusillas and realised very quickly that I would end up with 5-7 photographs that all looked the same and which would not demonstrate any great technical or creative ability...so idea abandoned. 

But, on a spontaneous trip to Worthing on the way back from Drusillas, another idea came to mind.  I could try to show two different perspectives on English life - "This is England or is it?", with one perspective being themes that are quintessentially English and the contradiction being themes whereby due to the framing (e.g. a palm tree against a hotel) could be from somewhere that is not England.  Back to Worthing tomorrow to try it out!  Themes could include (and not necessarily be tied or limited to this):
  • Ethnic diversity
  • Food
  • Plants
  • Buildings
  • Restaurants
  • Street signs in different languages or the London tube map / Hong Kong tube map in Newport Court in London WC2
  • Customs e.g. tea and scones / drinking starbucks coffee  
Inspiration for this partly comes from work by Martin Parr and his portraits showing English life and images of English things.  Other photographers that also come to mind that show a truly English perspective also include Paul Russell from a satirical perspective!  Venues for shooting include central London, Keswick and perhaps a September trip to the seaside if the weather improves....

7 September 2014

I missed the boat on the last idea.  The season for people eating ice creams on the pier is really over.  I love the theme of English summer and Englishness, so I will save this for another occasion.  But, fortunately, another idea has come to mind!  Through my participation in the Bleeding London project, I've got to know my local area, Feltham, very well.  And I've noticed that there are two very distinct sides of the same story.  The area is typically run down, lacking investment, rough, dilapidated and so on, but there are pockets of more attractive qualities, which if photographed selectively and shown out of context, would present a very different story and also present a distinct series of contrasts:
  • confinement vs space (Young Offenders vs the open space in front of it)
  • dilapidation vs regeneration (building opposite Macdonalds vs the new academy being built)
  • struggling economy vs booming economy (empty restaurant vs full (and happy) kebab shop
  • neglected front garden vs elaborately tended front garden (multiple gardens to chose from full of junk vs the lovely one with the amazing happy hedges in Cedar Road, which although awful just makes me smile)! (see photo below taken earlier this year - to be reshot though)
  • rowdiness vs peace (outside the Weatherspoon Pub vs the cemetery)
  • crowded living space vs beautiful house (blocks of flats with railings vs original beamed house on Ashford Road)
  • angry scary people vs happy people (people at bus stop vs people exercising dogs)

Cedar Road
My intention is to process the positives in colour, and the negatives in black and white (to enhance a gritty and more documentary feel and reduce the risk of colour/light making it seem more positive).  My only reservation on that is that I have been told many times not to mix colour with b&w in the same project/series, so I'm taking advice on that from fellow students/Crossing Lines members. 

These images are most likely to be viewed in an academic context only, so by my tutor, the assessors, other students, and also members of Crossing Lines.  I think I will be unlikely to show these images to people in a social context or to print and hang them on my own walls, although with any photos I take, there is always a chance that they will be entered into an exhibition!   

Am I taking any risks with this?  In a word, yes.  Walking through Feltham with a DLSR is always a risk, and especially with a D810 (it is insured!); taking the pair of street photographs of people might be tricky....might get punched.... ;-)

15 September 2014

So my thoughts are evolving - along the lines of the above, I'm thinking of looking for contrasts that I can shoot by being in the same position and pivoting 180 degrees - and also finding resonance and contrast within each pair in the process:
  • weapons bin / cash machine
  • dilapidated building / new look shop
  • pub / church or cemetery
  • young offenders / open space
  • garden opposite / garden with hedges
22 September 2014

In the end, I went with the option described on 7 September 2014 above, but with the colour option only.  I decided it was too cliched to present the negative concepts in black and white.  I wanted to present the opposite views with resonances also and colour would help significantly with that.

The objective of this exercise was really to see if by careful framing, I could produce a convincing series of the better qualities of Feltham.  This illustrates the point made by Susan Sontag (2003) about a photograph:

"It is always the image that someone chose; to photograph is to frame, and to frame is to exclude".

What I would be doing is, as photographers do with every shot, presenting a selective and subjective view.  Hopefully by looking at each set, the viewer would be able to form an opinion of the area dictated by choices I made.  I will comment on whether this is successful in the reflections post.

I tried the 180 degrees option described on 15 September 2014, but found very quickly that this wouldn't work with the sun shining in my face...and I didn't have the time flexibility to make two trips to each point.  Unfortunately, I didn't get my hedges - the sun was in the wrong place at the wrong time, plus there were cars parked outside the house each time I went to have a look :(.  But I did get seven sets of contrasts:
  • weapons / cash machine
  • dilapidated building / new building
  • end of life (cemetery) / new life (conkers)
  • bust business / thriving business
  • abandoned toy / rescued toy
  • cramped living (flats) / detached living ground (house)
  • confined (young offenders) / open (green space)
The execution took place during two days towards the end of September - one day with beautiful light, and I also used four pictures taken on the previous day which was dull and flat; this accounts for the different lighting in the series, which would not have been my preference, but it is what it is.

My approach to editing and processing is very simple.  For a start, I did not have to make many choices, all the good light photographs were deliberately shot, and the four with flat light (pairs B and E) were in fact chosen from a bank of Bleeding London photographs taken on the previous day that were better in terms of concept and composition than two of the pairs intended.  All were shot with Nikon D810 body and a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G lens.  Processing took place in ViewNX 2 and followed a simple routine: straighten, crop, exposure adjustment, shadow protection adjustment, (in same cases picture control reset to Landscape) contrast, colour boost and sharpening.  As the lens is new there were no blemishes to remove.  That's all I do.  I'm capable of a little more in Elements, but for this piece of work, there really was no need.

All pictures submitted are in square format.  This is a personal preference from a creative perspective, which I can't really explain.  I just really like square images!  Matt Stuart told me that I need to be able to answer this question if I'm going to continue to use square format, so it might be because I like pictures that are straight to the point and which exclude unnecessary information.  But I can't be certain of that theory!  In some cases, I prefer rectangle pictures (landscape), so it just depends.  I tend to avoid vertical rectangles if I can.  In any case, for this submission, square format seemed to work well in terms of composition, so I will be interested to see what the feedback is.  In addition, I think square format works for viewing on personal devices.

These photographs were mostly taken for the purposes of the assignment, with the exception of pairs B and E, as previously mentioned.  It is likely that they will only be seen by my tutor, fellow students and the assessors, plus the Crossing Lines group that I'm going to show them to (on account of their interest in urban conditions).  Pairs B and E are online on the Bleeding London submission site, and hopefully will be included in the Bleeding London exhibition (if they are selected).

See submission for the final results.

References
  • Bate, D. (2013), Photography The Key Concepts, London: Bloomsbury Academic
  • Sontag, S. (2003), Regarding the Pain of Others, London: Penguin Group
Websites

Part One - Photograph as document: Project Three - Reportage: Research Point - Street Photography

All images reproduced in this post have been included by kind permission of their original author.  The copyright remains with the photographer stated.  All other images are my own.

Introduction

The course materials ask us to do some research into contemporary street photography.  To be perfectly frank, I've been doing this for a while, for over two years in fact.  And my summer this year has been nothing but street photography, having participated in an In-Public workshop and a four-day LSP course on Photojournalism and Street Photography (see: Day One, Day Two, Day Three, Day Four).
And later on this year, I will be participating in a week-long street photography work-shop in Varanasi, India with Maciej Dakowicz.  Plus, I should mention my own extra-curricular efforts (see various related albums on Flickr) .... although more miss than hit at the moment (not sure I'm blessed in this department......).

So having been exposed to so many sources and descriptions of street photography, I feel that I'm in quite a good place to be able to write up a summary of the contemporary street photographers that inspire and influence me.  I'm also going to write this from the point of view of preparation for themes for the street photography exercise also for Project Three.

(Click the "street photography" label below to identify all work related to street photography during this Context and Narrative module).

Background

I discovered street photography by accident.  I bought my first DSLR (a Nikon D5000) in Hong Kong in December 2010, and without knowing anything about a) how to use it or b) anything about photography at all, I just started shooting random tourist shots of things I liked, and on a trip to Macao produced a couple of images that really kick-started my interest in behaviour and moments in time in public situations:



It was then during a conversation with my then TAOP tutor, where I mentioned that I just liked taking photos of situations in the street, that he recommended I get a copy of Street Photography Now, on which I posted a review in July 2012.  This was really the epiphany moment!  And it was from the revelation of this book that I got to know the work of many of the photographers whose work I now follow (some mentioned below).  After that, there followed two years of some unstructured experimenting and reading, until this summer, where in the quest to find my own style and meaning to photography, I decided to take some courses and workshops specifically in street photography (incidentally, I am still torn between street, travel and wildlife photography...and getting to the point where I think I just like to photograph "life" irrespective of genre....why does it need a label?).

What is Street Photography?

I have found over the past couple of years, that a much debated question is what exactly is street photography?  What does it mean?  What is the point of it?

It seems to me that different people have different perspectives on street photography.

An academic viewpoint is that expressed by Paul Halliday in Defining Street Photography, which is an all-encompassing all aspects of the narratives of the street.   And in fact, an awful lot of what I see on the internet and in publications described as street photography includes portraits, urban landscapes, travel scenes, and street scenes in general, as generally examined in Freeman, 2011 (see previous review).  However, and contrary to Halliday, I enjoy a different contemporary branch of street photography that focuses on the funny and the strange, as described below and which is consistent with the In-Public perspective on this, (bearing in mind that the boundaries with travel photography can be blurred as in Dakowicz (2011) Pillow - see below).

In my own work I try to make a distinction between social documentary, portraiture, landscape and street photography - although all of these can of course be executed in the street and are recognisable as forming part of the broader street photography genre.  For instance, I would describe this photograph taken in July 2014 in Camden Town as a street portrait (albeit candid), rather than street photography:


because, apart from the beautiful subject, light and colours, there is not a lot more to it.  But perhaps this photograph taken in Worthing in August 2014, which, although also a portrait, is more street photography because it tells a story and has a sense of irony (funny or sad depending on how you look at it) about the last days of summer (Last of the Summer Wine?):


What I have gained from general reading, exhibitions, meeting other photographers and my participation in the In-Public workshop, is that firstly, street photography does not need to have been taken in a street.  For instance, Nils Jorgensen recreated the legend of the Underwater Gnomes of Wastwater (2011) in Cumbria reported by BBC News, although he was nowhere near a street at the time!

Underwater Gnomes (c) by Nils Jorgensen
Street photography also does not need to include animate objects, for example Matt Stuart's capture of an apparent peacock in New Bond Street (2006) (also features on the back cover of Street Photography Now):

New Bond Street (c) by Matt Stuart
In my view (formed by wider reading and attendance at workshops), and this is how I try to form my own practice, street photography is the manifestation and capture of one or more of the following events in a public context:
  • incongruence between two or more elements in the image, i.e. a situation that is absurd in its context, a twist, a strange juxtaposition
  • resonance between two or more elements in the image
  • something comical (but it has to be more than a person dressed in a funny costume....), i.e. interaction with a background
  • something comical that has a deeper social meaning
  • social commentary
  • something completely unexpected
  • irony / satire (akin to Far Side situations)
  • order out of chaos
  • extraordinary use of light
  • interplay of colour
  • portraits provided they are candid and tell a story or present the subject in a comical or other emotive, or cultural perspective
  • a situation made funny by the title and composition, as in Jorgensen (2011) Underwater Gnomes above (this particularly works well with dry humour or the art of understatement!).
People always say that you should know why you are taking a photograph and be able to answer questions about what the point is of what your image?  I think that once you have established the boundaries of street photography described above, the answer to that is clear: to make people laugh or to support a social dialogue.

I think of street photography as almost the photography equivalent to jazz music.  It has its own rules (i.e. it breaks the traditional rules of composition), its own rhythm, it own timing and its own direction.  The right-brained approach to its execution suits my spontaneous nature.  You can plan street photography as much as you like (i.e. locate a suitable background and wait for the right subject), but it is highly dependent on random events coming together in one scene or sequence.  Personally, I love that moment of panic when you realise that you have a situation in front of you and you've got to grab it then and there.  It's an adrenalin rush when it happens and even better if it works out!

In the next sections, I'll look at a few of my favourite images by some of the contemporary photographers (listed in alphabetical order) that I find inspiring, and will comment on why the images are interesting and what the edge is that makes them street photography, rather than just a captured scene.

Maciej Dakowicz

Dakowicz is a now Mumbai-based reportage and street photographer.  He has previously lived in the UK in Cardiff, Wales, where he shot the images for his monograph Cardiff After Dark, a collection of 99 colour photographs depicting scenes shot in streets in Cardiff once the pubs had shut and the party had really begun.  At first glance, these photos are hilarious: funny people doing funny things after a "few too many".  The feat of this collection, and the commitment to its production, should not be under estimated: "...he photographed the same few streets in Cardiff on a Saturday night for five years" (O'Hagen in Dakowicz, 2012, p9).

You can take these photos at face value (i.e. without social judgement) as just people having fun.  However, you could also read a deeper social commentary into this about the British way of life, our apparent obsession with alcohol over-consumption, and the lack of shame when we do it.  I however prefer to enjoy the former (as I know I've been there too!), the sheer hilarity of these situations.  Is Dakowicz taking advantage of people in compiling this work?  Are these photographs gratuitous?  I don't think so; a) its within his photographer's rights and b) in my mind, if you've put yourself in such a situation in public then fair game! I would describe this kind of street photography as fitting into the something comical that has a deeper social meaning theme mentioned above.  You could also describe it as reportage, as it belongs in a collection providing an insight into a situation.

Picking out one photograph from this collection to illustrate the point is not easy.  They are all relevant, but I am still drawn to the very first one I saw when I originally looked at in Street Photography Now, and which had me in stitches (for the sense of normality and concentration in the subject's expression); it is published in Dakowicz, 2012, p39 and in Howarth et al, 2012 p32; the photograph was taken in 2006:

Pink Hat (c) by Maciej Dakowicz
There is however another side to Dakowicz's street photography and a significant portion of this kind of work has been shot in Asia.  And I think this is where the boundary between street and travel photography, and indeed reportage, become blurred.  One image that really demonstrates this for me is:

Pillow (c) Maciej Dakowicz
This is street photography, because it is a comical (although also slightly sad) image shot in a public place.  It contains a sense of irony (enhanced by the title).  You can read a social commentary/reportage into this i.e. about the stray dogs of India, and of course it is also travel photography because it's providing an insight into the way of life in another country.  I actually don't really care that it is any of the above.  I'm drawn to this as an emotive response as I have seen my own dogs put their heads in strange and uncomfortable looking places.  I also wish I'd taken it!

Melanie Einzig

Like most of the other contemporary street photographers I'm familiar with, I first came across New York-based Einzig through Howarth et al, 2012 pp 40-43, in which she is described (p40) as a "whimsical anthropologist".  Interesting that she says her best photographs are taken on the way to and from work; my brain is usually too broken to be able to do that, but I should try harder.  Einzig's photographs are bright and colourful, and the one I particularly like is shown on Howarth et al, 2012 p43 of a gentleman on the New York subway wearing yellow crochet doing his knitting.  Hilarious.  And I think, from my proposed themes above, this would fit into the category of something completely unexpected.  And of course, what really makes the photo is the fact that the other passengers on the train seem completely oblivious to the gentleman in yellow!

Unfortunately, the only online source to this image that I can find is this one: http://pikdit.com/i/he-didnt-choose-the-knitting-game-the-knitting-game-chose-him/ [accessed 25 August 2014].

David Gibson

I met London-based Gibson at the In-Public workshop mentioned above.   Like many of the other contemporary street photographers mentioned in this post, Gibson also captures absurd situations and visual puns.  I particularly like this image of some children waiting in the street by the No Parking sign taken in 2008, featured in Howarth et al, 2012 p52 and in Gibson, 2014 p53.  It's funny, the subjects are interacting with the background in an incongruous way, and there is also resonance in the gestures and expressions of the children.   In addition, Gibson has brought some order into a potentially chaotic situation: 

London (c) David Gibson
Another example of Gibson's work, where the subject is interacting with the background, can be seen in this image from Gibson, 2014, p87 taken in 2010 of a woman who looks as if she is about to propel herself from the mattresses; this reminds me of the position static line parachute jumpers have to assume in order to launch themselves from the plane doorway:

London (c) David Gibson
Gibson's other styles go beyond my interpretations of street photography into the realms of abstract imagery, as featured in Gibson, 2014, pp 116-117 and 126-129.  And on the workshop I learnt from him about looking for abstract shapes, gestures and pattern repetitions within street scenes.  Although this is not a direction I particularly want to go in at the moment (I prefer the comedy situations!),  I have ventured down this route in the past and I am not dismissing it as a future option either.

Nils Jorgensen

I also met London-based Jorgensen on the In-Public workshop.  Jorgensen's style is to capture absurd and comical moments, but his approach is quite different.  For a start he carries a professional camera (rather than trying to remain hidden and inconspicuous) and he also favours a frenetic approach (rather than stealth) to riding the London underground and capturing the comedy to be found below.  Gibson descibes him as "tenacious" and some who "takes photographs on the way to taking photographs" (Gibson, 2014 p 90).  I particularly like this image, taken in 2006, again interaction between foreground and background, which looks as if there is a line of heads peering out over the woman reading the newspaper (similar to people reading over your shoulder on the tube!) :

Tight Squeeze (c) Nils Jorgensen
Dave Mason

I got to know London-based Mason's work through my first ever street photography workshop I participated in held by him in Greenwich in November 2012.  Aspects I really like about Mason's work include his ability to capture funny events while no one else in the scene is paying any attention at all, (extraordinary within the ordinary) and also the layering (as does Dakowicz and Wallace also) that he introduces into the frames.  I've seen three photographs by Mason quite recently that have really grabbed my attention (read three among many!): "There's never a number 11 when you want one" and "Refurbishment", both shot in 2014, and "Greenwich" shot in 2012 (during my workshop :) ). 

There's never a number 11 when you want one (c) Dave Mason
I particularly like this image because of the layering of the different subjects, but also because of the comedy of the person reading the bus time-table without realising what's going on behind him.

Refurbishment (c) Dave Mason
In this image, the comedy is derived from the title referring to juxtaposition of the person and the building.  In this, and the image above, Mason has found a funny situation (he actually found lots!) in an event, whereas my photographs from both the 2014 London Naked Bike Ride and the Pride festival were of a more journalistic style, so I was able to learn from these examples.

Greenwich (c) Dave Mason
This image is another example of interaction between subject and background.  Mason has humorously arranged the scene to make it appear as if the display is actually part of the queue.  

Shin Noguchi

Based in Kamakura and Tokyo, Japan, Noguchi's style is quite different to the other photographers mentioned in this post.  Noguchi also aims to capture life's extraordinary moments, but in his images, he also injects beauty and grace.   In his project, "Sorry, you'll never walk alone", he looks at contradictions between human nature and what he refers to as the "essence of society"; this project documents the inability of humans to walk without carrying something in their hands.

Some of his images remind me of Far Side scenes - the extraordinary element is sometimes quite subtle - and you are faced with an intellectual challenge to work it out! With Noguchi, I know that if I haven't got it the first time, I need to look harder, as the sense of irony is definitely there.

But in addition to the contradictions, Noguchi also captures an extraordinary use of light with high contrast and spotlight on the subject, for instance in this image of a gentleman carrying his dog wearing a winter jacket in the streets of Kamakura 2012.

Komachi, Kamakura 2011 (c) Shin Noguchi
When you view the "Sorry, you'll never walk alone" series as a collection, you really appreciate the benefit of executing street photography on the basis of a theme; the images really hold well together and from one to another.

Another of Noguchi's images that I have noted recently is this one from his Colour 50: Something Here series taken in 2011 in Guam, showing a child carrying a pool inflatable walking into a room with suspended window cleaners looking through.  This is an example of the juxtaposition that is inexplicable (although may also be a commentary on the US territory of Guam that I'm not aware of ?):
Tumon, Guam 2011 (c) Shin Noguchi
Finally, on the subject of contrast (colours), resonance (chameleon tail shapes), this image taken in 2014 by Noguchi is a great example that poses almost confusion and leaves you thinking; it's hard to see where the check layers actually lie.

Ginza, Tokyo 2014 (c) Shin Noguchi
David Solomons

London-based Solomons is the third photographer I had the privilege of working with on the In-Public workshop and is another photographer whose work I think is sometimes also quite "Far Side".  Solomons is also a photographer who works in terms of projects, this one below (which I would put into the funny and absurd themes from above) is from "Forty Winks":

Leyton (c) David Solomons
Another image by Solomons that also stands out in the funny / incongruous category is this one taken in 2009 from the "Up West" project showing great contrast between Tesco and Reiss, and the bored (assume) husband dragged along shopping for ladies clothes:

Oxford Street (c) David Solomons
Matt Stuart

I think London-based Stuart (also a tutor on the In-Public workshop) was probably the first exposure I had to street photography, as his 2007 image Trafalgar Square graces the front cover of Street Photography Now (and is also included in Seaborne et al, 2011 p110), and which I believe has sparked a trend in photographing pigeons amongst Stuart devotees:

Trafalgar Square (c) Matt Stuart
This image illustrates the point made above about resonance (legs), plus also appears absurd and disproportionate.  It also introduces the concept of framing, with legs being framed within legs.  It's also funny that the pigeon is leading....

However, there is another photograph by Stuart that I also like taken in Aldersgate Street (date not known):

Aldersgate Street (c) Matt Stuart
And that's most likely because of the dog - but also the clever framing to make it appear that the dog is in the driving seat!  Finally, I think that for Stuart, it's worth mentioning his shots showing interaction with backgrounds with the comical High Holborn (date not known):

High Holborn (c) Matt Stuart
Many of Stuart's images contain themes of resonance, apparent absurdities and interactions with backgrounds as illustrated above.

Dougie Wallace

Last but not least, a photographer that has recently come into my world is London-based Wallace (aka "Glasweegee").  I first came across Wallace earlier this summer when I attended the launch party for his book Stags, Hens and Bunnies.   Very similar style to Cardiff After Dark (and a response to?), however I think Wallace takes this to another level of what can only be described as British behaviour.....  As with Cardiff After Dark, I think these images fall into the theme of comedy (hilarious) but with a deeper social message.  Set in Blackpool, England, in this case, the social message is not just about the excessive consumption and outrageous behaviour, it is also about the tension Blackpool faces every weekend: "hen night central or historic family seaside resort?  It can't be both" (Wallace, 2014, p9).  This is as much about the economic tension, as anything else: would Blackpool survive if you took away the night-time economy?

So what of the photos?  There are simply crazy; no other words to describe them.  Here is just one relatively tame example displayed in Wallace, 2014, p17, with wonderful contrast between pink and yellow, but as with Dakowicz 2012, you just have to see the book to get the full impact:

All the Fun of the Fair (c) Dougie Wallace
Conclusion

The contemporary photographers presented here show a cross-selection of themes based on my analysis above.  I have selected individual photographs and these have been shown out of context to illustrate specific points, but in context you see that all these photographers do in fact make use of all the themes I described above in different situations.  What remains to be seen now is whether I can put it into practice for the exercise!


Research Point Questions
  • What difference does colour make to a genre that traditionally was predominantly black and white?  The only black and white image I looked at above for my research was Greenwich by Mason.  I'm guessing he excluded colour to reduce distraction and to make the figure in the display blend into the queue more easily.  On the whole, I prefer colour street photography, and I think that most of the work I've shown here is dependent on colour, especially work by Stuart, Wallace and Dakowicz.  Wallace's work in particular has the same colour/light feel about it as that of the seaside photos of Martin Parr (see website).   Trafalgar Square by Stuart is almost monochromatic, but the pink of the pigeon legs really make those legs stand out!  I find that black and white in street photography adds a timeless and almost documentary/journalistic feel; it makes it seem more informative, as seen in various images in Seaborne et al, 2011.  Colour adds a more contemporary, brighter, modern feel to the image.  For instance in Seaborne et al, 2011, p96, there is a photograph of a homeless person sleeping rough.  The image is dated 1997 so many decades after when colour photography became popular, and although the subject is juxtaposed against a background in an interactive way, the image still appears more documentary than it would have done had it been produced in colour.
  • Can you spot the shift away from the influence of surrealism (as in Cartier-Bresson's work)?  To be honest, no I can't!  I think the work illustrated here borders on surrealism - it's just a more modern interpretation, and I think more surreal than Cartier-Bresson.  For example, the selective framing of Leyton by Solomons, London (2010) by Gibson, Tumon, Guam by Noguchi, and Aldersgate Street by Stuart, are all quite surreal.  I think the shift over time has been away from a documentary style, e.g. as represented in Delaney et all, 2012, and more towards this style of comedy, irony, incongruence and surrealism.
  • How is irony used to comment on British-ness or American values?  I think Pink Hat by Dakowicz and All the Fun of the Fair by Wallace are great examples of this.  From these images an outsider would suppose that the British value this kind of behaviour and promote an excessive culture of consumption, and that that is normal.  Another example is Refurbishment by Mason; we value freedom of speech, behaviour and to be yourself without suffering prejudice, yet here Mason has presented a scene that is ironic as a result of the juxtaposition.
Exercise

This research was all in aid of preparation for an exercise on street photography (course notes page 33).  We are required to take 30 colour and 30 black and white photographs in ONE street.  I would consider myself lucky if I got 60 good street photography type images (according to my interpretations) in a whole life time, so 60 in one street is a tall order....... Clearly the OCA has a broader view of street photography than I do.....

One aspect of street photography that I really like is English seaside images, which I haven't really covered much above.  I think you see some great street photography moments in England's seaside resorts.  For instance Barry Island by Solomons taken in 1994:

Barry Island (c) David Solomons
and the Lladudno series by Parr

[24 August] So I think for my street, I'm going to have a go at the street that runs alongside the seafront in Worthing on 25 August (fun fair, food festival, pier) - called various names in different places, but I will walk the length of the seafront along Worthing using my themes defined above, but incorporating a documentary / satirical style of seaside portraits inspired by Parr.  I don't know yet how I'll tackle the black and white - I'll work that out later.  I can always go back another day to finish it off.

[25 August] Plan thwarted by amber rain alert... not the kind of rain that blows over and is followed by bright colours against beautiful dark skies and amazing clarity - but non-stop torrential rain.  No point in going to Worthing as a) my camera will get drenched and possibly damaged, but b) people are unlikely to be outside.  Strong risk of getting there to find an empty promenade!  Back to the drawing board.  Other options include my original plan of Bond Street (New and Old together) as it has excellent backdrops, tourists, and so on, or I can try to get back to the seaside during September if the weather improves.....

[13 September] In the end I went to Brighton for a day of seafront people shots.  Not quite consistent with my "In-Public" definitions, but a documentary nevertheless of Brighton's residents!  See street photography exercise also for Project Three.


Photographers mentioned websites:
References:
  • Dakowicz, M. (2012) Cardiff After Dark, London: Thames & Hudson, p39
  • Delaney, H. and Baker, S. (2012), Another London, London: Tate Publishing 
  • Freeman, M. (2013) Michael Freeman's photo school street, Lewes: ILEX 
  • Gibson, D. (2014) The Street Photographer's Manual, London: Thames & Hudson p53 and 87
  • Howarth, S. and McLaren, S. (2011) Street Photography Now, London: Thames & Hudson, front and back covers, p32, p40-43
  • O' Hagan, S in Dakowicz, M. (2012) Cardiff After Dark, London: Thames & Hudson, p9
  • Seaborne, M and Sparahm, A. (2011) London Street Photography 1860-2010, Stockport: Dewi Lewis Publishing, p110
  • Wallace, D. (2014) Stags, Hens and Bunnies, Stockport: Dewi Lewis Media, p9
Websites:

Source Websites for images uploaded:


Saturday, 2 August 2014

LSP - Photojournalism and Street Photography - Day Three

On Day Three (26th July) (after feedback on the British Museum assignment from Day Two) we learnt about photojournalism, reportage and documentary:
  • Photojournalism: witnesses and records events as they happen; images often have to be dramatic in order to be competitive
  • Reportage: more in-depth story telling, picture essays, viewpoint of photographer present
  • Documentary: images that document location, event, situation - insight into culture, history, society.
Notable photojournalists include:
For photojournalism, context is critical - photos need captions to avoid ambiguity.   For example, Molotov Man, taken in Nicaragua by Susan Meiselas, has been used for propaganda by both sides of the revolution.

Another example of narrative we discuss is the work by 2013 Deutsche Boerse nominee Cristina de Midel "Afronaughts".  This body of work challenges our perceptions of context and reality.  Photojournalists are supposed to represent the truth - and she does - but in a conceptual way.  I remember reading about this piece of work in British Journal of Photography, but can't find any notes on it in previous blogs (note-to-self to try to find it!).

In documentary photography, there is always a tension between beauty, ugliness, truth and emotion.  Also, documentary/photojournalism portraits need to imply all aspects of context - can be candid, environmental, posed (classic).  Steve McCurry is a good example: see previous notes on Afghan Girl).  See also Martin Parr for parts of a person, bright colours and funny context.

Our assignment for Day Three was to go to Camden Town and photograph portraits as follows:
  1. Group scene
  2. Portrait in environment/context
  3. 5 aspects of the same portrait (including asking permission from someone)
  4. Detail of a portrait
  5. Candid portrait
This exercise went well - better than expected in fact.  Feedback took place in the moment looking at the camera screen and on the whole was great.  Only comment was to get in closer!  Here are my results (i.e. the best of - I took loads!):

1. Group scene:


2. Portrait in environment:


3.  5 aspects of same portrait (two situations):



















4. Details of a portrait:


5. Candid portrait:



And as an added bonus, on the way back after the day had finished, I took this.  Really impressed with the colours with D8100 (no photoshop!):