Waiting for Summer

Waiting for Summer
Showing posts with label Matt Stuart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matt Stuart. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 January 2015

Street Photography Research

In the feedback I received to Assignment Two, my tutor recommended I also look at the following street photographers:
  • Joel Sternfeld
  • Stephen Shore
  • Saul Leiter
  • William Eggleston
  • Helen Levitt.

Joel Sternfeld

Sternfeld's website doesn't appear to work, so I had to look around through google images and so on.  No doubting the artistic qualities of Sternfeld's images, but the people shots looked posed to me, not candid.  To me this makes the photographs more documentary than street.  To understand them, I would therefore need some context about their story, why they were being photographed, connection with their environment.  Not really what I'm looking for in street photography.  

Stephen Shore

To research Shore, I looked at his website.  Now I'm confused, I wouldn't describe this as Street Photography either, although the American Surfaces images could be.  I did like the Israel/West Bank series though, as having read the book Extreme Rambling by Mark Thomas, which documents his journey along the separation barrier between Israel and the West Bank, and have been wondering what it would be like to repeat the exercise and document the differences in people's lives.

Saul Leiter

I am familiar with Leiter, in fact, Matt Stuart once said that one of my images of Piccadilly Circus looked like one of his :)  (see https://www.flickr.com/photos/alisonadcock/14045898482/), which is nice!

Leiter, who started out as a fashion photographer, was a great pioneer of colour and abstract Street Photography;  he does not seem to have his own site, and sadly he passed away in 2013.  So I turned to lensculture magazine for material to look at.  I like these images; I particularly like Snow (1960) published in The Guardian in his obituary article: http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/nov/29/saul-leiter.  I love the colour, condensation, sense of cold, simple palette, sense of fleeting moment; and you can see this influence in Nick Turpin's recent work "Through a Glass Darkly", beautiful but calm and peaceful images.  

William Eggleston

Eggleson's own website doesn't show his images.  I saw a couple of other articles and got the sense that he was a great pioneer of colour photography also (how many pioneers do we need?) but in the end, I turned to Eric Kim's Photography blog for some information.   Like Kim, I looked at the pictures of seemingly banal everyday subjects and wondered what....?  I can see the lessons are important, photograph where you live etc, I tried this with Feltham, my local neighbourhood, both for the Bleeding London project (which I got really tired of) and Assignment One.  I didn't like doing it.  I want to make images that are funny, confusing, perplexing, even surreal, but not banal and everyday.

Helen Levitt

Briefly looking at Google images before I tried to find a specific website, and I saw instantly that her work is more akin to what I can relate to, and bears similarities to that of Vivian Meier.  Also sadly no longer with us, and not having a website of her own, I turned again to lensculture magazine to an article entitled New York Streets 1938 to 1990 showing both her black and white image and super saturated colour shots.  The image of the girl by the green car taken in New York in 1970 I had seen before at the Question of Colour exhibition at Somerset House a couple of years ago.  I like her work and have put Slide Show on my Amazon wishlist!  I think that looking at a collection of Street Photography that has built up over a period of time is very interesting - it shows society, history, culture and change.
Websites:

Own work referred to:

Saturday, 4 October 2014

Part One - Photograph as document: Project Three - Reportage: Research Point - Post Script

Since completing my original post on Project 3 - Reportage - Research Point I have come across another piece of writing that would have been helped me in my original research provide a more balanced article.

The article in question is written by Anita Strasser, who is a fellow member of Crossing Lines, and is studying for her MA in Photography and Urban Cultures at Goldsmiths University of London.   In 2013, Strasser wrote an assignment paper entitled Re-re-conceptualising Street Photography:towards a more reflexive definition, which included an account of her own experience in entering a street photography competition with restrictions on non-candid images.

Strasser argues in her reasoned and thought-provoking paper that due to the popularity and impact of the In-Public style of Street Photography, the genre has moved away from the traditional role of documenting social and historical contexts in the street and towards the representation of the "funny and bizarre" using a shoot and run approach that I stated as my Street Photography practice in my previous post.  She further makes the point that the now current exclusion of the traditional approaches and purposes of Street Photography has no purpose and also undermines the real value of Street Photography in opening social debate.   Strasser reinforces the point with the example of the Museum of London exhibition and book in 2011 of Street Photography from 1860-2010 (see previous post), which excluded the work of Markéta Luskačová (to be reviewed in a later post). 

Strasser is of course right in her views.  Street Photography in the traditional sense has played a significant role in documenting social, economic, and "providing historical insights into cities and peoples" and it absolutely must continue to do so.  There is clearly a place and purpose for this kind of photography, and what street photographers are capturing now will be of significant interest to people in the future; there is no denying this.

In In-Public's defence, and these observations are anecdotal from my experience of attending their workshop (I have not sought to validate them with references):
  • There is very little, if any, commercial gain in their type of photography.  Yes a few of them have published books and hosted workshops, but this is not how they earn a living.  They all have real jobs, either in photography, or in some other field.  And in fact, Matt Stuart told me that the workshops are mostly loss-making.
  • They do not profess to be offering any social, political or historical value, or in fact any significant purpose at all. 
  • At the In-Public workshop I attended, we covered the history of Street Photography as each photographer spoke about their influences.
  • The objectives of this type of photography are not to ridicule or humiliate people but to capture random events that manifest together in a frame usually to provide a resonance or contrast, in such a way that an unique and spontaneous scene presents.  If the outcome is comical, that is a bonus.  When you engage with a subject, and move from candid to non-candid, that unique moment is lost.
  • The final image is a truth - at that moment in time.  Of course it's heavily influenced by the angle, framing, perspective etc, but isn't that true of all photography?  Aren't all photographic images representations of what the photographer saw and excluded during that moment in time?
  • And what of another In-Public photographer, Maciej Dakowicz?  His work is sometimes engaged, sometimes candid, sometimes about the random events but not always, has strong travel/documentary/reportage themes, and can be serious and funny.  
  • This type of photography is extremely hard.  It takes a certain kind of thought process, lightening speed reactions, and extreme dexterity to make it work. 
In my defence, I am interested in both types of Street Photography: social documentary and In-Public style.  My limitations with practicing social documentary are that once I have worked a full week, kept up with my OCA studies, seen my neglected family, friends and rescue animals, there is very little time left and certainly not enough time available to start engaging with communities.  I enjoy In-Public style street photography as a way of letting off steam.  It allows me some freedom of movement away from computers/offices, fresh air, visual stimulation, I can jump into it without doing any planning, and to be honest it's fun.  I am also extremely right-brained in my approach to photography (and I make no apology for this -it's instinctive), which goes hand-in-hand with the In-Public style of looking for these random events and springing into action.  Is it shallow?  Yes of course it is, but I think there is enough meaning in the rest of my life to afford me this escape.  Long-term I realise it has no real future for me as a photographer in terms of career development, and I am still searching for what that path might be, but I hope it will always remain at least in the hobby part of my photography.

So what is the answer?  The conclusion of Strasser's essay is a call to redefine Street Photography.  If that was the case, would we have two new categories: street documentary and street random manifestations?  And what about street travel?  A lot of street photography to me also looks like travel photography, e.g. in APF (because it is an international magazine and I see it from an English point of view), and I consider this also to be in a documentary style rather than In-Public style.   There is also a similar boundary, although perhaps more obvious, between nature and wildlife photography: the former accepting and the latter excluding captive animals; but surely both can provide pleasing studies of animals and both are acceptable in the right conditions?

I am actually not sure what is required, as there is sufficient work around Street Photography that does not include the In-Public definition, to make me believe that not everyone considers that this is the be all and end all of Street Photography.   For instance, on the LSP course I attended (see July and August posts), the In-Public style was not mentioned once during the eight days, and nor was it mentioned in the Michael Freeman book I reviewed.   In fact, I really wonder why we need genres, labels and so on.  Part of the problem I have is that in searching for a path to follow, it seems that I should be expected to drop other interests.  Why do I have to chose between wildlife, travel, street (In-Public style) and more conceptual work (e.g. for OCA assignments)?  I enjoy them all.  Why do I need to be labelled?  Surely I am documenting life in a variety of situations?

Whilst I strongly sympathise with Strasser, and I think in her shoes I would have had the same reaction, in my view, what is important is that boundaries or requirements for competitions, exhibitions, pieces of work are clearly defined, so that entrants and audience alike understand what they are in for, i.e. it must be made very clear, so that there can be no doubt, whether the work in question relates to engaged documentary or to candid observational photography.  At the end of the day, Street Photography is such a broad topic that some refinement is needed to define the precise purpose of a body of work be it to engage in social reflection or quite simply to provide some light entertainment.

References:
Websites:
Own work referenced:

Part One - Photograph as document: Reflections

Well - what a jam-packed experience this has been!  Probably largely due to the amount of off-course activities I've been doing as well, but also from the increased momentum in undertaking more academic work than actual photography.  During Part One, I have (in no particular order):
  • Conducted some thorough research into Street Photography
  • Understood the difference between Street Photography, Documentary and Reportage
  • Learned more about and tried out Photojournalism
  • Photographed the 2014 Pride and the Naked Bike Ride
  • Considered my own feelings on war porn
  • Investigated the nature of the neighbourhood I live in
  • Created my first and last composite photograph
  • Reviewed eight exhibitions
  • Read nine relevant books/articles
  • Met Dougie Wallace, Matt Stuart, Nils Jorgensen, David Gibson and David Solomons
  • Caught up with Dave Mason
  • Taken 311 photographs for Bleeding London
  • Understood that I am a right-brained photographer (and successfully resisted peer pressure to keep a sketch book - what's that for??? - I would never be able to plan a photo like that!)
  • Taken part in an LSP course on Street Photography and Photojournalism
  • Taken part in an In-Public workshop.
No wonder I'm tired....

The highlight of the course, despite my reservations about not being able to produce 60 photographs that meet my interpretation of street photography, was in fact my day out in Brighton for the Project 3 Street Photography Exercise.  This was an amazing day and my favourite kind of day; I loved both the shooting and the editing afterwards, and I wish this had been the assignment brief!

Saturday, 23 August 2014

Assignment One - Two Sides of the Story - Preparation and Execution

Assignment One asks that we choose a theme and prepare 5-7 images for each of two sets of photographs telling different versions of the same story.

23 August

For my theme, my first idea was to show life in a zoo park from two different perspectives: outsiders looking in, and animals looking out.  The idea for this has come from two different sources: firstly because I want to try out my D810 plus new lenses on animals (it has only been used for street photography so far!) and particularly to test whether the ability to handle dynamic range i.e. black creatures in midday sun, is better than the D5000 I was previously using (and for reasons of time I need to multitask!), and secondly I'm intrigued by the image taken by Count de Montizon in 1852 in London of the Hippopotamus at the Zoological Gardens, Regents Park, see Bate, 2013, p24 (which I first wrote about during Digital Photographic Practice - see here for a summary).

Bate uses the image to demonstrate the that there may be different points of view within a photograph.  In this instance, we know from our general knowledge that it is extremely likely that the hippo is the one in the cage, however, looking at the photograph, the onlookers appear to be in the cage.  There is a realism that we know to be true, and then there is doubt about where the viewer is placed, and indeed where the hippo is placed in relation to the viewer (Bate, 2013, pp37-40).  It asks the question whether humans been imprisoned by nature.

So, I'm going try to take 5-7 pairs of photographs showing the perspective of the animal, or the viewer inside the cage, looking out, and the perspective of onlookers looking in, to produce representations of the juxtapositions of these two worlds that are forced to co-exist.

I don't know yet whether these will be colour or black and white, or square or rectangle format.  Being right-brained, I will decide later!  A lot will depend on the lighting, background detail, what stands out.  I suspect the outcome will be colour and rectangle landscapes, but we will see.

24 August
So I tried to put my idea into practice at Drusillas and realised very quickly that I would end up with 5-7 photographs that all looked the same and which would not demonstrate any great technical or creative ability...so idea abandoned. 

But, on a spontaneous trip to Worthing on the way back from Drusillas, another idea came to mind.  I could try to show two different perspectives on English life - "This is England or is it?", with one perspective being themes that are quintessentially English and the contradiction being themes whereby due to the framing (e.g. a palm tree against a hotel) could be from somewhere that is not England.  Back to Worthing tomorrow to try it out!  Themes could include (and not necessarily be tied or limited to this):
  • Ethnic diversity
  • Food
  • Plants
  • Buildings
  • Restaurants
  • Street signs in different languages or the London tube map / Hong Kong tube map in Newport Court in London WC2
  • Customs e.g. tea and scones / drinking starbucks coffee  
Inspiration for this partly comes from work by Martin Parr and his portraits showing English life and images of English things.  Other photographers that also come to mind that show a truly English perspective also include Paul Russell from a satirical perspective!  Venues for shooting include central London, Keswick and perhaps a September trip to the seaside if the weather improves....

7 September 2014

I missed the boat on the last idea.  The season for people eating ice creams on the pier is really over.  I love the theme of English summer and Englishness, so I will save this for another occasion.  But, fortunately, another idea has come to mind!  Through my participation in the Bleeding London project, I've got to know my local area, Feltham, very well.  And I've noticed that there are two very distinct sides of the same story.  The area is typically run down, lacking investment, rough, dilapidated and so on, but there are pockets of more attractive qualities, which if photographed selectively and shown out of context, would present a very different story and also present a distinct series of contrasts:
  • confinement vs space (Young Offenders vs the open space in front of it)
  • dilapidation vs regeneration (building opposite Macdonalds vs the new academy being built)
  • struggling economy vs booming economy (empty restaurant vs full (and happy) kebab shop
  • neglected front garden vs elaborately tended front garden (multiple gardens to chose from full of junk vs the lovely one with the amazing happy hedges in Cedar Road, which although awful just makes me smile)! (see photo below taken earlier this year - to be reshot though)
  • rowdiness vs peace (outside the Weatherspoon Pub vs the cemetery)
  • crowded living space vs beautiful house (blocks of flats with railings vs original beamed house on Ashford Road)
  • angry scary people vs happy people (people at bus stop vs people exercising dogs)

Cedar Road
My intention is to process the positives in colour, and the negatives in black and white (to enhance a gritty and more documentary feel and reduce the risk of colour/light making it seem more positive).  My only reservation on that is that I have been told many times not to mix colour with b&w in the same project/series, so I'm taking advice on that from fellow students/Crossing Lines members. 

These images are most likely to be viewed in an academic context only, so by my tutor, the assessors, other students, and also members of Crossing Lines.  I think I will be unlikely to show these images to people in a social context or to print and hang them on my own walls, although with any photos I take, there is always a chance that they will be entered into an exhibition!   

Am I taking any risks with this?  In a word, yes.  Walking through Feltham with a DLSR is always a risk, and especially with a D810 (it is insured!); taking the pair of street photographs of people might be tricky....might get punched.... ;-)

15 September 2014

So my thoughts are evolving - along the lines of the above, I'm thinking of looking for contrasts that I can shoot by being in the same position and pivoting 180 degrees - and also finding resonance and contrast within each pair in the process:
  • weapons bin / cash machine
  • dilapidated building / new look shop
  • pub / church or cemetery
  • young offenders / open space
  • garden opposite / garden with hedges
22 September 2014

In the end, I went with the option described on 7 September 2014 above, but with the colour option only.  I decided it was too cliched to present the negative concepts in black and white.  I wanted to present the opposite views with resonances also and colour would help significantly with that.

The objective of this exercise was really to see if by careful framing, I could produce a convincing series of the better qualities of Feltham.  This illustrates the point made by Susan Sontag (2003) about a photograph:

"It is always the image that someone chose; to photograph is to frame, and to frame is to exclude".

What I would be doing is, as photographers do with every shot, presenting a selective and subjective view.  Hopefully by looking at each set, the viewer would be able to form an opinion of the area dictated by choices I made.  I will comment on whether this is successful in the reflections post.

I tried the 180 degrees option described on 15 September 2014, but found very quickly that this wouldn't work with the sun shining in my face...and I didn't have the time flexibility to make two trips to each point.  Unfortunately, I didn't get my hedges - the sun was in the wrong place at the wrong time, plus there were cars parked outside the house each time I went to have a look :(.  But I did get seven sets of contrasts:
  • weapons / cash machine
  • dilapidated building / new building
  • end of life (cemetery) / new life (conkers)
  • bust business / thriving business
  • abandoned toy / rescued toy
  • cramped living (flats) / detached living ground (house)
  • confined (young offenders) / open (green space)
The execution took place during two days towards the end of September - one day with beautiful light, and I also used four pictures taken on the previous day which was dull and flat; this accounts for the different lighting in the series, which would not have been my preference, but it is what it is.

My approach to editing and processing is very simple.  For a start, I did not have to make many choices, all the good light photographs were deliberately shot, and the four with flat light (pairs B and E) were in fact chosen from a bank of Bleeding London photographs taken on the previous day that were better in terms of concept and composition than two of the pairs intended.  All were shot with Nikon D810 body and a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G lens.  Processing took place in ViewNX 2 and followed a simple routine: straighten, crop, exposure adjustment, shadow protection adjustment, (in same cases picture control reset to Landscape) contrast, colour boost and sharpening.  As the lens is new there were no blemishes to remove.  That's all I do.  I'm capable of a little more in Elements, but for this piece of work, there really was no need.

All pictures submitted are in square format.  This is a personal preference from a creative perspective, which I can't really explain.  I just really like square images!  Matt Stuart told me that I need to be able to answer this question if I'm going to continue to use square format, so it might be because I like pictures that are straight to the point and which exclude unnecessary information.  But I can't be certain of that theory!  In some cases, I prefer rectangle pictures (landscape), so it just depends.  I tend to avoid vertical rectangles if I can.  In any case, for this submission, square format seemed to work well in terms of composition, so I will be interested to see what the feedback is.  In addition, I think square format works for viewing on personal devices.

These photographs were mostly taken for the purposes of the assignment, with the exception of pairs B and E, as previously mentioned.  It is likely that they will only be seen by my tutor, fellow students and the assessors, plus the Crossing Lines group that I'm going to show them to (on account of their interest in urban conditions).  Pairs B and E are online on the Bleeding London submission site, and hopefully will be included in the Bleeding London exhibition (if they are selected).

See submission for the final results.

References
  • Bate, D. (2013), Photography The Key Concepts, London: Bloomsbury Academic
  • Sontag, S. (2003), Regarding the Pain of Others, London: Penguin Group
Websites

Part One - Photograph as document: Project Three - Reportage: Research Point - Street Photography

All images reproduced in this post have been included by kind permission of their original author.  The copyright remains with the photographer stated.  All other images are my own.

Introduction

The course materials ask us to do some research into contemporary street photography.  To be perfectly frank, I've been doing this for a while, for over two years in fact.  And my summer this year has been nothing but street photography, having participated in an In-Public workshop and a four-day LSP course on Photojournalism and Street Photography (see: Day One, Day Two, Day Three, Day Four).
And later on this year, I will be participating in a week-long street photography work-shop in Varanasi, India with Maciej Dakowicz.  Plus, I should mention my own extra-curricular efforts (see various related albums on Flickr) .... although more miss than hit at the moment (not sure I'm blessed in this department......).

So having been exposed to so many sources and descriptions of street photography, I feel that I'm in quite a good place to be able to write up a summary of the contemporary street photographers that inspire and influence me.  I'm also going to write this from the point of view of preparation for themes for the street photography exercise also for Project Three.

(Click the "street photography" label below to identify all work related to street photography during this Context and Narrative module).

Background

I discovered street photography by accident.  I bought my first DSLR (a Nikon D5000) in Hong Kong in December 2010, and without knowing anything about a) how to use it or b) anything about photography at all, I just started shooting random tourist shots of things I liked, and on a trip to Macao produced a couple of images that really kick-started my interest in behaviour and moments in time in public situations:



It was then during a conversation with my then TAOP tutor, where I mentioned that I just liked taking photos of situations in the street, that he recommended I get a copy of Street Photography Now, on which I posted a review in July 2012.  This was really the epiphany moment!  And it was from the revelation of this book that I got to know the work of many of the photographers whose work I now follow (some mentioned below).  After that, there followed two years of some unstructured experimenting and reading, until this summer, where in the quest to find my own style and meaning to photography, I decided to take some courses and workshops specifically in street photography (incidentally, I am still torn between street, travel and wildlife photography...and getting to the point where I think I just like to photograph "life" irrespective of genre....why does it need a label?).

What is Street Photography?

I have found over the past couple of years, that a much debated question is what exactly is street photography?  What does it mean?  What is the point of it?

It seems to me that different people have different perspectives on street photography.

An academic viewpoint is that expressed by Paul Halliday in Defining Street Photography, which is an all-encompassing all aspects of the narratives of the street.   And in fact, an awful lot of what I see on the internet and in publications described as street photography includes portraits, urban landscapes, travel scenes, and street scenes in general, as generally examined in Freeman, 2011 (see previous review).  However, and contrary to Halliday, I enjoy a different contemporary branch of street photography that focuses on the funny and the strange, as described below and which is consistent with the In-Public perspective on this, (bearing in mind that the boundaries with travel photography can be blurred as in Dakowicz (2011) Pillow - see below).

In my own work I try to make a distinction between social documentary, portraiture, landscape and street photography - although all of these can of course be executed in the street and are recognisable as forming part of the broader street photography genre.  For instance, I would describe this photograph taken in July 2014 in Camden Town as a street portrait (albeit candid), rather than street photography:


because, apart from the beautiful subject, light and colours, there is not a lot more to it.  But perhaps this photograph taken in Worthing in August 2014, which, although also a portrait, is more street photography because it tells a story and has a sense of irony (funny or sad depending on how you look at it) about the last days of summer (Last of the Summer Wine?):


What I have gained from general reading, exhibitions, meeting other photographers and my participation in the In-Public workshop, is that firstly, street photography does not need to have been taken in a street.  For instance, Nils Jorgensen recreated the legend of the Underwater Gnomes of Wastwater (2011) in Cumbria reported by BBC News, although he was nowhere near a street at the time!

Underwater Gnomes (c) by Nils Jorgensen
Street photography also does not need to include animate objects, for example Matt Stuart's capture of an apparent peacock in New Bond Street (2006) (also features on the back cover of Street Photography Now):

New Bond Street (c) by Matt Stuart
In my view (formed by wider reading and attendance at workshops), and this is how I try to form my own practice, street photography is the manifestation and capture of one or more of the following events in a public context:
  • incongruence between two or more elements in the image, i.e. a situation that is absurd in its context, a twist, a strange juxtaposition
  • resonance between two or more elements in the image
  • something comical (but it has to be more than a person dressed in a funny costume....), i.e. interaction with a background
  • something comical that has a deeper social meaning
  • social commentary
  • something completely unexpected
  • irony / satire (akin to Far Side situations)
  • order out of chaos
  • extraordinary use of light
  • interplay of colour
  • portraits provided they are candid and tell a story or present the subject in a comical or other emotive, or cultural perspective
  • a situation made funny by the title and composition, as in Jorgensen (2011) Underwater Gnomes above (this particularly works well with dry humour or the art of understatement!).
People always say that you should know why you are taking a photograph and be able to answer questions about what the point is of what your image?  I think that once you have established the boundaries of street photography described above, the answer to that is clear: to make people laugh or to support a social dialogue.

I think of street photography as almost the photography equivalent to jazz music.  It has its own rules (i.e. it breaks the traditional rules of composition), its own rhythm, it own timing and its own direction.  The right-brained approach to its execution suits my spontaneous nature.  You can plan street photography as much as you like (i.e. locate a suitable background and wait for the right subject), but it is highly dependent on random events coming together in one scene or sequence.  Personally, I love that moment of panic when you realise that you have a situation in front of you and you've got to grab it then and there.  It's an adrenalin rush when it happens and even better if it works out!

In the next sections, I'll look at a few of my favourite images by some of the contemporary photographers (listed in alphabetical order) that I find inspiring, and will comment on why the images are interesting and what the edge is that makes them street photography, rather than just a captured scene.

Maciej Dakowicz

Dakowicz is a now Mumbai-based reportage and street photographer.  He has previously lived in the UK in Cardiff, Wales, where he shot the images for his monograph Cardiff After Dark, a collection of 99 colour photographs depicting scenes shot in streets in Cardiff once the pubs had shut and the party had really begun.  At first glance, these photos are hilarious: funny people doing funny things after a "few too many".  The feat of this collection, and the commitment to its production, should not be under estimated: "...he photographed the same few streets in Cardiff on a Saturday night for five years" (O'Hagen in Dakowicz, 2012, p9).

You can take these photos at face value (i.e. without social judgement) as just people having fun.  However, you could also read a deeper social commentary into this about the British way of life, our apparent obsession with alcohol over-consumption, and the lack of shame when we do it.  I however prefer to enjoy the former (as I know I've been there too!), the sheer hilarity of these situations.  Is Dakowicz taking advantage of people in compiling this work?  Are these photographs gratuitous?  I don't think so; a) its within his photographer's rights and b) in my mind, if you've put yourself in such a situation in public then fair game! I would describe this kind of street photography as fitting into the something comical that has a deeper social meaning theme mentioned above.  You could also describe it as reportage, as it belongs in a collection providing an insight into a situation.

Picking out one photograph from this collection to illustrate the point is not easy.  They are all relevant, but I am still drawn to the very first one I saw when I originally looked at in Street Photography Now, and which had me in stitches (for the sense of normality and concentration in the subject's expression); it is published in Dakowicz, 2012, p39 and in Howarth et al, 2012 p32; the photograph was taken in 2006:

Pink Hat (c) by Maciej Dakowicz
There is however another side to Dakowicz's street photography and a significant portion of this kind of work has been shot in Asia.  And I think this is where the boundary between street and travel photography, and indeed reportage, become blurred.  One image that really demonstrates this for me is:

Pillow (c) Maciej Dakowicz
This is street photography, because it is a comical (although also slightly sad) image shot in a public place.  It contains a sense of irony (enhanced by the title).  You can read a social commentary/reportage into this i.e. about the stray dogs of India, and of course it is also travel photography because it's providing an insight into the way of life in another country.  I actually don't really care that it is any of the above.  I'm drawn to this as an emotive response as I have seen my own dogs put their heads in strange and uncomfortable looking places.  I also wish I'd taken it!

Melanie Einzig

Like most of the other contemporary street photographers I'm familiar with, I first came across New York-based Einzig through Howarth et al, 2012 pp 40-43, in which she is described (p40) as a "whimsical anthropologist".  Interesting that she says her best photographs are taken on the way to and from work; my brain is usually too broken to be able to do that, but I should try harder.  Einzig's photographs are bright and colourful, and the one I particularly like is shown on Howarth et al, 2012 p43 of a gentleman on the New York subway wearing yellow crochet doing his knitting.  Hilarious.  And I think, from my proposed themes above, this would fit into the category of something completely unexpected.  And of course, what really makes the photo is the fact that the other passengers on the train seem completely oblivious to the gentleman in yellow!

Unfortunately, the only online source to this image that I can find is this one: http://pikdit.com/i/he-didnt-choose-the-knitting-game-the-knitting-game-chose-him/ [accessed 25 August 2014].

David Gibson

I met London-based Gibson at the In-Public workshop mentioned above.   Like many of the other contemporary street photographers mentioned in this post, Gibson also captures absurd situations and visual puns.  I particularly like this image of some children waiting in the street by the No Parking sign taken in 2008, featured in Howarth et al, 2012 p52 and in Gibson, 2014 p53.  It's funny, the subjects are interacting with the background in an incongruous way, and there is also resonance in the gestures and expressions of the children.   In addition, Gibson has brought some order into a potentially chaotic situation: 

London (c) David Gibson
Another example of Gibson's work, where the subject is interacting with the background, can be seen in this image from Gibson, 2014, p87 taken in 2010 of a woman who looks as if she is about to propel herself from the mattresses; this reminds me of the position static line parachute jumpers have to assume in order to launch themselves from the plane doorway:

London (c) David Gibson
Gibson's other styles go beyond my interpretations of street photography into the realms of abstract imagery, as featured in Gibson, 2014, pp 116-117 and 126-129.  And on the workshop I learnt from him about looking for abstract shapes, gestures and pattern repetitions within street scenes.  Although this is not a direction I particularly want to go in at the moment (I prefer the comedy situations!),  I have ventured down this route in the past and I am not dismissing it as a future option either.

Nils Jorgensen

I also met London-based Jorgensen on the In-Public workshop.  Jorgensen's style is to capture absurd and comical moments, but his approach is quite different.  For a start he carries a professional camera (rather than trying to remain hidden and inconspicuous) and he also favours a frenetic approach (rather than stealth) to riding the London underground and capturing the comedy to be found below.  Gibson descibes him as "tenacious" and some who "takes photographs on the way to taking photographs" (Gibson, 2014 p 90).  I particularly like this image, taken in 2006, again interaction between foreground and background, which looks as if there is a line of heads peering out over the woman reading the newspaper (similar to people reading over your shoulder on the tube!) :

Tight Squeeze (c) Nils Jorgensen
Dave Mason

I got to know London-based Mason's work through my first ever street photography workshop I participated in held by him in Greenwich in November 2012.  Aspects I really like about Mason's work include his ability to capture funny events while no one else in the scene is paying any attention at all, (extraordinary within the ordinary) and also the layering (as does Dakowicz and Wallace also) that he introduces into the frames.  I've seen three photographs by Mason quite recently that have really grabbed my attention (read three among many!): "There's never a number 11 when you want one" and "Refurbishment", both shot in 2014, and "Greenwich" shot in 2012 (during my workshop :) ). 

There's never a number 11 when you want one (c) Dave Mason
I particularly like this image because of the layering of the different subjects, but also because of the comedy of the person reading the bus time-table without realising what's going on behind him.

Refurbishment (c) Dave Mason
In this image, the comedy is derived from the title referring to juxtaposition of the person and the building.  In this, and the image above, Mason has found a funny situation (he actually found lots!) in an event, whereas my photographs from both the 2014 London Naked Bike Ride and the Pride festival were of a more journalistic style, so I was able to learn from these examples.

Greenwich (c) Dave Mason
This image is another example of interaction between subject and background.  Mason has humorously arranged the scene to make it appear as if the display is actually part of the queue.  

Shin Noguchi

Based in Kamakura and Tokyo, Japan, Noguchi's style is quite different to the other photographers mentioned in this post.  Noguchi also aims to capture life's extraordinary moments, but in his images, he also injects beauty and grace.   In his project, "Sorry, you'll never walk alone", he looks at contradictions between human nature and what he refers to as the "essence of society"; this project documents the inability of humans to walk without carrying something in their hands.

Some of his images remind me of Far Side scenes - the extraordinary element is sometimes quite subtle - and you are faced with an intellectual challenge to work it out! With Noguchi, I know that if I haven't got it the first time, I need to look harder, as the sense of irony is definitely there.

But in addition to the contradictions, Noguchi also captures an extraordinary use of light with high contrast and spotlight on the subject, for instance in this image of a gentleman carrying his dog wearing a winter jacket in the streets of Kamakura 2012.

Komachi, Kamakura 2011 (c) Shin Noguchi
When you view the "Sorry, you'll never walk alone" series as a collection, you really appreciate the benefit of executing street photography on the basis of a theme; the images really hold well together and from one to another.

Another of Noguchi's images that I have noted recently is this one from his Colour 50: Something Here series taken in 2011 in Guam, showing a child carrying a pool inflatable walking into a room with suspended window cleaners looking through.  This is an example of the juxtaposition that is inexplicable (although may also be a commentary on the US territory of Guam that I'm not aware of ?):
Tumon, Guam 2011 (c) Shin Noguchi
Finally, on the subject of contrast (colours), resonance (chameleon tail shapes), this image taken in 2014 by Noguchi is a great example that poses almost confusion and leaves you thinking; it's hard to see where the check layers actually lie.

Ginza, Tokyo 2014 (c) Shin Noguchi
David Solomons

London-based Solomons is the third photographer I had the privilege of working with on the In-Public workshop and is another photographer whose work I think is sometimes also quite "Far Side".  Solomons is also a photographer who works in terms of projects, this one below (which I would put into the funny and absurd themes from above) is from "Forty Winks":

Leyton (c) David Solomons
Another image by Solomons that also stands out in the funny / incongruous category is this one taken in 2009 from the "Up West" project showing great contrast between Tesco and Reiss, and the bored (assume) husband dragged along shopping for ladies clothes:

Oxford Street (c) David Solomons
Matt Stuart

I think London-based Stuart (also a tutor on the In-Public workshop) was probably the first exposure I had to street photography, as his 2007 image Trafalgar Square graces the front cover of Street Photography Now (and is also included in Seaborne et al, 2011 p110), and which I believe has sparked a trend in photographing pigeons amongst Stuart devotees:

Trafalgar Square (c) Matt Stuart
This image illustrates the point made above about resonance (legs), plus also appears absurd and disproportionate.  It also introduces the concept of framing, with legs being framed within legs.  It's also funny that the pigeon is leading....

However, there is another photograph by Stuart that I also like taken in Aldersgate Street (date not known):

Aldersgate Street (c) Matt Stuart
And that's most likely because of the dog - but also the clever framing to make it appear that the dog is in the driving seat!  Finally, I think that for Stuart, it's worth mentioning his shots showing interaction with backgrounds with the comical High Holborn (date not known):

High Holborn (c) Matt Stuart
Many of Stuart's images contain themes of resonance, apparent absurdities and interactions with backgrounds as illustrated above.

Dougie Wallace

Last but not least, a photographer that has recently come into my world is London-based Wallace (aka "Glasweegee").  I first came across Wallace earlier this summer when I attended the launch party for his book Stags, Hens and Bunnies.   Very similar style to Cardiff After Dark (and a response to?), however I think Wallace takes this to another level of what can only be described as British behaviour.....  As with Cardiff After Dark, I think these images fall into the theme of comedy (hilarious) but with a deeper social message.  Set in Blackpool, England, in this case, the social message is not just about the excessive consumption and outrageous behaviour, it is also about the tension Blackpool faces every weekend: "hen night central or historic family seaside resort?  It can't be both" (Wallace, 2014, p9).  This is as much about the economic tension, as anything else: would Blackpool survive if you took away the night-time economy?

So what of the photos?  There are simply crazy; no other words to describe them.  Here is just one relatively tame example displayed in Wallace, 2014, p17, with wonderful contrast between pink and yellow, but as with Dakowicz 2012, you just have to see the book to get the full impact:

All the Fun of the Fair (c) Dougie Wallace
Conclusion

The contemporary photographers presented here show a cross-selection of themes based on my analysis above.  I have selected individual photographs and these have been shown out of context to illustrate specific points, but in context you see that all these photographers do in fact make use of all the themes I described above in different situations.  What remains to be seen now is whether I can put it into practice for the exercise!


Research Point Questions
  • What difference does colour make to a genre that traditionally was predominantly black and white?  The only black and white image I looked at above for my research was Greenwich by Mason.  I'm guessing he excluded colour to reduce distraction and to make the figure in the display blend into the queue more easily.  On the whole, I prefer colour street photography, and I think that most of the work I've shown here is dependent on colour, especially work by Stuart, Wallace and Dakowicz.  Wallace's work in particular has the same colour/light feel about it as that of the seaside photos of Martin Parr (see website).   Trafalgar Square by Stuart is almost monochromatic, but the pink of the pigeon legs really make those legs stand out!  I find that black and white in street photography adds a timeless and almost documentary/journalistic feel; it makes it seem more informative, as seen in various images in Seaborne et al, 2011.  Colour adds a more contemporary, brighter, modern feel to the image.  For instance in Seaborne et al, 2011, p96, there is a photograph of a homeless person sleeping rough.  The image is dated 1997 so many decades after when colour photography became popular, and although the subject is juxtaposed against a background in an interactive way, the image still appears more documentary than it would have done had it been produced in colour.
  • Can you spot the shift away from the influence of surrealism (as in Cartier-Bresson's work)?  To be honest, no I can't!  I think the work illustrated here borders on surrealism - it's just a more modern interpretation, and I think more surreal than Cartier-Bresson.  For example, the selective framing of Leyton by Solomons, London (2010) by Gibson, Tumon, Guam by Noguchi, and Aldersgate Street by Stuart, are all quite surreal.  I think the shift over time has been away from a documentary style, e.g. as represented in Delaney et all, 2012, and more towards this style of comedy, irony, incongruence and surrealism.
  • How is irony used to comment on British-ness or American values?  I think Pink Hat by Dakowicz and All the Fun of the Fair by Wallace are great examples of this.  From these images an outsider would suppose that the British value this kind of behaviour and promote an excessive culture of consumption, and that that is normal.  Another example is Refurbishment by Mason; we value freedom of speech, behaviour and to be yourself without suffering prejudice, yet here Mason has presented a scene that is ironic as a result of the juxtaposition.
Exercise

This research was all in aid of preparation for an exercise on street photography (course notes page 33).  We are required to take 30 colour and 30 black and white photographs in ONE street.  I would consider myself lucky if I got 60 good street photography type images (according to my interpretations) in a whole life time, so 60 in one street is a tall order....... Clearly the OCA has a broader view of street photography than I do.....

One aspect of street photography that I really like is English seaside images, which I haven't really covered much above.  I think you see some great street photography moments in England's seaside resorts.  For instance Barry Island by Solomons taken in 1994:

Barry Island (c) David Solomons
and the Lladudno series by Parr

[24 August] So I think for my street, I'm going to have a go at the street that runs alongside the seafront in Worthing on 25 August (fun fair, food festival, pier) - called various names in different places, but I will walk the length of the seafront along Worthing using my themes defined above, but incorporating a documentary / satirical style of seaside portraits inspired by Parr.  I don't know yet how I'll tackle the black and white - I'll work that out later.  I can always go back another day to finish it off.

[25 August] Plan thwarted by amber rain alert... not the kind of rain that blows over and is followed by bright colours against beautiful dark skies and amazing clarity - but non-stop torrential rain.  No point in going to Worthing as a) my camera will get drenched and possibly damaged, but b) people are unlikely to be outside.  Strong risk of getting there to find an empty promenade!  Back to the drawing board.  Other options include my original plan of Bond Street (New and Old together) as it has excellent backdrops, tourists, and so on, or I can try to get back to the seaside during September if the weather improves.....

[13 September] In the end I went to Brighton for a day of seafront people shots.  Not quite consistent with my "In-Public" definitions, but a documentary nevertheless of Brighton's residents!  See street photography exercise also for Project Three.


Photographers mentioned websites:
References:
  • Dakowicz, M. (2012) Cardiff After Dark, London: Thames & Hudson, p39
  • Delaney, H. and Baker, S. (2012), Another London, London: Tate Publishing 
  • Freeman, M. (2013) Michael Freeman's photo school street, Lewes: ILEX 
  • Gibson, D. (2014) The Street Photographer's Manual, London: Thames & Hudson p53 and 87
  • Howarth, S. and McLaren, S. (2011) Street Photography Now, London: Thames & Hudson, front and back covers, p32, p40-43
  • O' Hagan, S in Dakowicz, M. (2012) Cardiff After Dark, London: Thames & Hudson, p9
  • Seaborne, M and Sparahm, A. (2011) London Street Photography 1860-2010, Stockport: Dewi Lewis Publishing, p110
  • Wallace, D. (2014) Stags, Hens and Bunnies, Stockport: Dewi Lewis Media, p9
Websites:

Source Websites for images uploaded:


Saturday, 12 July 2014

In-Public Street Photograpy Workshop

I spent last weekend with "the Beatles".  Not the real Beatles.... but the street photography equivalent; four photographers from the street photography collective "In-Public" - a group of photographers whose objective is to promote Street Photography and to explore its endless possibilities.  Not only was I privileged enough to participate in this workshop, but the four tutors were four from my contemporary street photography "greats" (I am also meeting another one, reportage and street photographer Maciej Dakowicz, at a workshop in Varanasi in October this year):
Each one has a unique style, but all bring a sense of comedy, which is what draws me to this particular genre of street photography.

Some colourful examples:
Here are my notes from the workshop (in no particular order):
  • Find a way of getting constructive feedback (i.e. not friends/family)
  • Make sure pictures have connotation
  • When piecing together a narrative make sure there is a strong start and a strong end
  • When putting together a body of work, make sure the pages are linked (like a visual word association)
  • Try removing the ground when photographing reflections
  • Pre-focus distances
  • Learn exposures (so it comes naturally)
  • Get subjects ("victims") used to the sound of the camera, so that you blend in to the background
  • Find good backgrounds and wait ("casting") - like "Far Side" scenes
  • Believe that you are invisible
  • Look for arrows and road markings
  • Get up high and look down
  • Look at shadows and profiles of faces in shadows
  • Work on projects/themes
  • Take sequences
  • Always take 2-3 photos - work the scene - different angles, aspects, perspectives, frozen actions
  • Look for words/signs - and either make them work with the scene (interaction) or remove them
  • Get familiar with http://www.photographersrights.org.uk/
  • Balance corners
  • Aim for different expressions across the frame
  • Don't waste space
  • Know why you are taking a photograph
  • For easy fast shooting - use Programme mode and turn off the LV (to stop yourself checking each shot) - learn to frame correctly
  • Be really disciplined about what the interesting part of the shot is
  • Be aware of everything in the frame
  • Eliminate everything in shooting that doesn't have a purpose in the frame
  • Move on to another project if you find it difficult to make the current one work
  • Within a project - get rid of duplicates - ask what each picture says about the project
  • When starting a project, list the objectives and what you are going to cover and not cover (shoot/avoid), what emotions you want to capture, and also parameters e.g. colour, landscape, 35mm
  • Be very selective and deliberate about what you are going to include in a project/portfolio
  • Find your style in editing - don't mix square/rectangle or colour/b&w in a portfolio or project
  • Avoid photographing people in funny suits - there needs to be some interaction that is unexpected or out of context
  • Get in closer
  • With poster board backgrounds - include some context of the wider frame
  • State the intention of the photograph more clearly
Photographers to study:
The workshop was organised such that the Friday evening was presentations and introductions by Gibson, Jorgensen, and Stuart.  What was interesting is that none of them make a living from Street Photography - they all do other photography work as well.  Then on the Saturday we were divided into groups and each spent some time with each of the tutors.  Then on the Sunday we had feedback both from the Saturday and also from previous work, and Solomons gave a presentation about how he has put together his Up West Project.

So how did I get on?  Well I had two comments that really resonated and gave me hope: they'd like to see more of my work as time goes on :-) (although probably just being nice...) and that some of my previous photos look like journalist or reportage style photos (so not street photography - but this was actually really helpful as I'm trying to find an avenue for the future and thinking about photojournalism!).  Here is an example of the more "reportage" style taken on 28 June 2014 at the London Pride march.

London Pride

At the workshop, on the Saturday, the first part of my day was spent with Solomons.  He took us on a walk from Piccadilly Circus, along Piccadilly, up Bond Street, along Oxford Street and down Regent Street, with a focus on shopping as a theme.  I found it hard taking photographs in a group as if someone got to a scene first, I didn't want to do the same, so I missed out on a few shots.  BUT Bond Street will be a great location for Project Three - Reportage)

From this outing, I got this scene in Bond Street which got good feedback in the review part of the workshop: (for the resonance with the two heads)

Bond Street
Solomons also taught us crowd photos (manual focus 2m) walk into crowds and capture expressions.  This was a disaster - no photos to show!  BTW - I called this strategy "Crowd-surfing technique"!

This second photograph below was a good idea, but executed badly.  I should have framed the poster, so that more of the surrounding was included (instead of trying to make it look out of context), and also frozen the cyclist. 

Bond Street
The next segment of the day was a lot of fun and for me opened a new avenue.  Jorgensen took us on an adventure of the target rich environment of the tube.  Lots of tubes in fact.  It was chaotic, fun, crazy and on this occasion, shooting in a crowd was an advantage a it confused the passengers and made it easier to get closer.  Jorgensen convinced me, despite my better judgement to crank up the ISO and shoot on Programme mode (or P for Professional as he says!).  I've never used this before, but it was actually liberating.  The only trouble was that in some shots, I had elements softer than I would have liked, but I can work on that by paying more attention to the focus point in the viewfinder. 

Shots that worked well:

District Line
X
Shots that needed better execution:

Westminster
In Westminster, I took a portrait because I liked the dog.  This is not street photography!  Stuart suggested cropping into a square so you just see the dog's flayed arms and legs, but the ISO was too high on my camera (Nikon D5000) and the result too grainy.  I don't really think it works though with this crop.  But it gave me an idea for a project: Underground Dogs!



The other picture that I showed to the group that had potential but needed better framing was this one:

Circle Line
What caught my eye was the sea of yellow (hair and poles) but in editing, I saw the light patterns and converted to b&w.  During the review, I was advised to crop in to eliminate all the faces so it was just backs of heads and the one looking back.  I then decided to leave in colour to bring back the yellow theme.

Circle Line
After lunch, the next session was with Gibson.  Gibson wanted to teach us abstract and graphic patterns, and so took us to Trafalgar Square and the walkway above Villiers Street where we would have opportunities to look down.  Although this isn't a style that I particularly want to pursue, these pictures were well received during the review session:

Trafalgar Square
Trafalgar Square
Not so successful was this - not enough in the frame:

Villiers Street

I also took this in Trafalgar Square, which although outside the brief of the exercise, I liked, but was not so well received - not enough going on - needed a union jack flag, and rain, or something.  Pity - I like the faces and expressions!

Great British Summer

The final part of the day was spent with Stuart.  This was the hardest part of the day - by then I was tired and confused.  I felt like I had boxing gloves on and no longer understood street photography or knew how to use my camera.  Stuart made us stand in strategic points around Piccadilly Circus and rather than move around, let the photos come to us.  This was not very successful at all.  All the pictures I showed from this part of the day needed dramatic improvement.  The only one that conceptually was the right idea was this one:

Lion King
Stuart suggested trying this again with one person in the frame so that it's clear that the person is being poked by the fingers in the poster and to crop right in in the shooting so that everything else is eliminated.

We also got the opportunity to have previous photos reviewed.  I had mixed reviews on various photos, as you'd expect from four different tutors, but the overall winner was this one taken in April 2013.  I did actually enter it into LPOTY last year but didn't get anywhere :(  BUT really pleased to have one picture unanimously liked by all four tutors.  It's not comical in the street photography sense, but nicely abstract and pretty (quote Gibson)!

Piccadilly Circus
All in all this was a fantastic experience!  And one thing is clear - street photography is hard.  Really hard.  You need the luck of the devil (or Matt Stuart) to be good.  But, I'm comforted by the encouraging feedback I got, with some clear advice from Stuart to find a style and work hard at it.  Colourful squares stood out for him as my particular trait, so a good tip to pursue.

Websites: