Waiting for Summer

Waiting for Summer
Showing posts with label BJP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BJP. Show all posts

Sunday, 28 September 2014

Alejandro Cegarra - BJP September 2014

I first became of Alejandro Cegarra's work about half a year ago when I saw his Tower of David series at the Sony World Photography Awards exhibition earlier this year (see post in DPP blog).  So I was pleased to read in the September 2014 edition of BJP on page 7 that the same series has won him the Ian Parry Scholarship.  I found it interesting that Cegarra attributes his success to (Cegarra quoted Smyth, 2014, p7):

"I really believe that [being local] makes a difference; it gives you a deep understanding of what is really happening. [...]  'Move as a local but see as a foreigner; be a foreigner in your own country and be curious.'  That's what I'm trying to do".

I have heard similar perspectives previously.  To produce a successful project, you need to know and understand your subject but retain at the same time retain sufficient distance to produce commentary.

I find Cegarra's work very striking: clean lines, use of dark and light, and compelling subject matter.


References
  • Smyth, D. (2014) Alejandro Cegarra wins Ian Parry. British Journal of Photography 161 (7828), p. 7
Websites
Own work referenced

Saturday, 9 August 2014

Invisible War - BJP August 2014

I'm not quite sure how I feel about an article called Invisible War in the August 2014 issue of BJP.  The article, written by Laurence Butet-Roch, describes a body of work by photographer Christoph Bangert.  Entitled "War Porn", Bangert has put together a series of shocking, explicit, gruesome, and real images of war, shot over a ten-year period in conflict zones.

What is interesting is the decision to publish and why Bangert felt that they needed to be seen: "When you have all this unpublished material dormant on your hard drive, you get angry; you feel like you have failed in your mission, which is not only to take photographs, but also to show them" (Bangert quoted Butet-Roch, 2014, p64).  This implies that taking the photograph (or in fact capturing the "story") is only half the job.  If photographs are not seen, the exercise is pointless.  In this case, Bangert intended to provoke discussion about how images of horrific events are framed.  I think that a lot of people will look at these images published in BJP, but I wonder how many will go on to purchase the book, so from that perspective, is the context in which they are seen right?  Perhaps governments and heads of state should be forced to see wall-size reproductions in an exhibition....This said, the first edition of War Porn is already sold out. 

The article goes on to reference Susan Sontag and her work "Regarding the Pain of Others" and comments on her reactions to photographs of atrocities and whether they inspire peace, provoke revenge or simply raise awareness.  Bangert's reaction is simply that his images will not prevent further violence, but, if people cannot even look at the images, then we can't begin to think about preventing war, and that if you don't look at the pictures, then you simply don't care.

Thinking about my own reaction, I am amazed by war photography; not in a voyeuristic way, but in the ability of the photographer to carry out their work under such conditions - both from an emotional point of view and the issue of personal safety.  I previously wrote about Don McCullin in my DPP blog, and remember feeling stunned that he could continue his work, and like Bangert produce photographs that are technically competent (read brilliant!) and also creative and visually compelling, whilst the atrocity is happening around them.  In this case, Bangert has put together a collection of work that for a lot of people will be too gruesome to look at.  I can look at it, and I am beyond appalled that human beings can commit these atrocities and harm each other to such an extent, but I don't know if I would be able to retain sufficient composure to be actually able to deliver something like this myself.


Reference List

Butet-Roch, L. (2014) Invisible War. British Journal of Photography 161 (7827), pp.62-65

Saturday, 2 August 2014

LSP - Photojournalism and Street Photography - Day Three

On Day Three (26th July) (after feedback on the British Museum assignment from Day Two) we learnt about photojournalism, reportage and documentary:
  • Photojournalism: witnesses and records events as they happen; images often have to be dramatic in order to be competitive
  • Reportage: more in-depth story telling, picture essays, viewpoint of photographer present
  • Documentary: images that document location, event, situation - insight into culture, history, society.
Notable photojournalists include:
For photojournalism, context is critical - photos need captions to avoid ambiguity.   For example, Molotov Man, taken in Nicaragua by Susan Meiselas, has been used for propaganda by both sides of the revolution.

Another example of narrative we discuss is the work by 2013 Deutsche Boerse nominee Cristina de Midel "Afronaughts".  This body of work challenges our perceptions of context and reality.  Photojournalists are supposed to represent the truth - and she does - but in a conceptual way.  I remember reading about this piece of work in British Journal of Photography, but can't find any notes on it in previous blogs (note-to-self to try to find it!).

In documentary photography, there is always a tension between beauty, ugliness, truth and emotion.  Also, documentary/photojournalism portraits need to imply all aspects of context - can be candid, environmental, posed (classic).  Steve McCurry is a good example: see previous notes on Afghan Girl).  See also Martin Parr for parts of a person, bright colours and funny context.

Our assignment for Day Three was to go to Camden Town and photograph portraits as follows:
  1. Group scene
  2. Portrait in environment/context
  3. 5 aspects of the same portrait (including asking permission from someone)
  4. Detail of a portrait
  5. Candid portrait
This exercise went well - better than expected in fact.  Feedback took place in the moment looking at the camera screen and on the whole was great.  Only comment was to get in closer!  Here are my results (i.e. the best of - I took loads!):

1. Group scene:


2. Portrait in environment:


3.  5 aspects of same portrait (two situations):



















4. Details of a portrait:


5. Candid portrait:



And as an added bonus, on the way back after the day had finished, I took this.  Really impressed with the colours with D8100 (no photoshop!):