Waiting for Summer

Waiting for Summer
Showing posts with label W. Eugene Smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label W. Eugene Smith. Show all posts

Saturday, 11 October 2014

Part Two - Narrative: Project One - Telling a story: Exercise - Linear storylines

The exercise asks us to compare Briony Campbell's The Dad Project with Eugene Smith's Country Doctor article published in LIFE magazine, both examples of photo essays telling a linear story from an insider's point of view. 

I found these two articles very different from several aspects.  First of all, Country Doctor seemed to me to be very matter-of-fact, yes you get a sense of struggle from the images, but it didn't move me in the same way that The Dad Project, a very personal account, did, which had me reaching for the Kleenex way before I'd got to the end. 

The structure of the stories are also different.  The course materials describe Country Doctor as a linear photo essay, but is it?  The story presented is a chronicle shot over 23 days, but each photo represents a discrete event.  The events themselves are linked by the presence of the doctor and the subject matter, but this is not a sequential story.  Each photograph could be viewed individually, and the order that the images are presented in  could be changed.  It is not a beginning, middle and end narrative.  In addition, the text that accompanies the Country Doctor essay is not essential.  It's useful and interesting, but the photographs also speak for themselves; you can figure out what is going on without needing the text.  And the essay is essentially an account of the work of one individual and his relationship with a multitude of people that come and go in his life.  The photographs represent moments in his life (and the lives of his subjects), but there is no continuation of story.

In contrast, The Dad Project, is firstly a very linear account: it has an introduction, starting point, middle and end.  It is also an essay, illustrated by photographs, which support and increase the sense of emotion.  The essay, written in the first person, describes the relationship between two people, Campbell and her father, towards the end of her father's life.  It documents his illness, her way of dealing with it and coming to terms with the loss of her dad.  And in contrast to the Country Doctor, you could read the narrative without the photographs, and still get a deep insight into Campbell's emotions, but with the images somehow she really captures the emotions she feels.  She photographs the "unphotographable": love, pain, grief, upholding values, suffering, moments of optimism and death itself.

In terms of actual photography, the two bodies of work are obviously very different.  Country Doctor is captured in black and white with clear focus on elements e.g. angle of shooting, structure of composition, an attempt to make the doctor look heroic in the photographs.  Campbell's images are gentle and considered, colour, and truthful.

Campbell writes that the story is of an "ending without an ending": I think that by this she means three things:
  1. Reference to the concept of life after death
  2. The fact that when you lose someone close you never stop grieving, more that you learn to live with it and to give it space in your life, but it is a never ending process.  So I think she is referring to the first ending as the ending of her father's suffering, but that it has no ending because she will always love him and miss him
  3. Through her project, she has kept his memory alive and communicated it to a wide audience.  Thus the story continues.
References:

Saturday, 2 August 2014

LSP - Photojournalism and Street Photography - Day Two

Day Two (20 July) started with Holger recommending the Loupe Hoodman for viewing images on the camera, if we need to check them on the go.  I don't know if I need this really, at this stage; I tend to shoot a lot of photos to make sure I've got something, just checking for blinkies to make sure if exposure ok, and also a quick glance to see if exposure is right.  I have noticed though that you can't really see sharpness/focus very well on the screen, so this is something to bear in mind.

Our day began with a review of the Covent Garden expedition from LSP Day One.  I had a few pictures of railings and was advised that in a short photo essay to limit the type of image to just one.  I had tried to capture human form interacting with the background, but Holger thought this wasn't necessary and that shapes formed by humans are interesting enough.  He recommended looking at  Massimo Vitalli, who takes pictures of large groups of people in large format e.g. Disco, and then crops in to find little hidden stories.  Holger also suggested that in future I should be more aware of what my shots are about.  In respect of other people's contributions, he reminded us to look at crowds rather than performers and to pick out interesting reactions. 

We also spoke about Andreas Gursky and his picture Rhein II, which fetched over £2m at auction.   This is an image that is manipulated - and therefore hard to say what is true or not (we were discussing the concept of truth in photography).  I'm surprised a photograph can be this valuable, particularly one that is manipulated and can therefore be reproduced. 

The purpose of this day was to improve on our photo essay skills following the Covent Garden intro, and we were given the following pointers:
  • Don't mix black and white with colour
  • Create images that are on different levels
  • Juxtaposition can be between photos as well as within a single image
  • Realising what doesn't work is part of the creative process.
Photo essays were first popularised by Life Magazine; W. Eugene Smith was one of the most popular photo essayists (landmark photo essay Country Doctor), and then Leonard McCombe, who looked a private lives and Larry Burrows, Vietnam War photo journalist.  

(see slides for detailed structure of photo essay).

Simple structure of photo essay:
  1. Establishing Shot - wide-angle broad view - sets scene and what story is about - introduces context - introduction
  2. Portrait Shot - close up on subject or character of story
  3. Detail Shot - detail about the story or equipment - interrupts rhythm
  4. Interaction Shot - subject interacting with the environment or other people
  5. Signature Shot - gesture that sums up story - real emotion - story climax - decisive moment
Our assignment then was to go to Leicester Square and shoot some good openers or Establishing Shot.

Here are mine, with feedback below; we were reminded that this image needs to be quite general, landscape format, likely to be double page in a magazine, needs context, don't photograph people from behind, shot needs to hook viewer up immediately - should be someone the reader can relate to immediately.


1.

2.

3.

4.

  1. Window cleaner image - window cleaner is too small and photograph distracted by stuff below office block in the street.  Needs cropping to have impact (this didn't work so not loaded).
  2. Taxis are too common in London streets to really tell reader what the story would be about.  Many scenes could have London taxis in them, and not necessarily be about taxis.
  3. More interesting shot - has several layers - needs cropping and would be better if shopkeeper more visible.  Potentially tells story about someone who is trying to make a living.  Here is cropped version below.
  4. Most interesting of the four - raises questions - well composed - could make interesting story.



We then went to the British Museum to shoot a complete photo essay comprising five shots based on the structure above.  Our subject was "Tourists" This was quite hard as it was crowded and hot, plus I was so focussed on the objective, my exposure skills collapsed....(also going from dark to light frequently - forgot to change ISO) - so some of my shots are too grainy.  Here are the results I selected to present at Day Three:

1. Establishing

2. Portrait

3. Detail

4. Interaction

5. Signature
We received feedback on this assignment on Day Three as follows:
  1. Establishing: focus point is missing; agreed sets context but would be better with someone in focus in foreground that looks like a tourist
  2. Portrait: needs to be more of a classic portrait, i.e. blurred background to make the subject stand out and crop/zoom in to subject
  3. Detail: this is a portrait not detail (very good portrait) - detail should be of equipment e.g. camera, audio etc
  4. Interaction: very good
  5. Signature: not signature more portrait - too ambiguous for signature.  Signature needs to represent one moment that represents entire context (although in this case not sure what that would be...)