Waiting for Summer

Waiting for Summer

Sunday, 22 February 2015

Part Four - Reading Photographs: Project One - The languange of photography: Exercise - Elliott Erwitt

Page 97 of the course materials includes the iconic photograph by Elliott Erwitt, New York, 1974, showing a tiny dog standing next to a person and a bigger dog.  When you first see the little dog, you also notice the person's legs and then it takes a second look to notice the bigger dog's legs.  The photograph is of course meant to be comical, it uses a classic street photography technique of finding disproportionate contrasts.

The image is structured using three subjects along the rule of thirds; using threes and thirds is a popular technique in photography composition.  The three sets of legs along the vertical thirds and the feet all positioned on the bottom horizontal thirds.  The face of the small dog is in the bottom right intersection between the vertical right third and the near centre.  If this a vertical classic portrait, that would be the ideal positioning for the eyes!  But there are also some out of focus objects in the distance that add some resonance: on the left-hand side, two tree trunks echoing the bigger dogs legs, and on the right-hand side, there is the outline of a structure that looks like the frame of the small dog.  Also, bizarrely, the little dog is wearing a hat.   Why is this?  But, cleverly, the folds of the hat look a bit like the wrinkles in the boots.

We are asked to consider what the picture is saying.  My initial reaction is maybe nothing, perhaps Erwitt saw something funny in the park and reacted in the moment?  He is after all renowned for photographing dogs.  Or maybe it is a lesson in looking closer, because at first you don't notice that the legs on the left belong to a dog, not another person.  But on thinking more deeply, is Erwitt saying something about giving everyone a chance?  In this image, he has given the smallest subject the biggest prominence; it is the only subject to show its face and stare directly at the camera.  Or is he saying something about the role of dogs in our society?  One of the dogs has legs the same size as a human, whilst the other dog has been dressed up like a human.  What therefore is the relationship between these dogs and human?  Companions?  Bodyguard?  Plaything?

I am going to a talk and book signing with Erwitt on 24th April, so maybe I'll find out!  If I do, I'll add to this post.

References:
  • Erwitt, E. (1974) New York, image reproduced in OCA Context and Narrative Course Materials (2014) p. 97
Websites:

Dougie Wallace - in yer face - BJP January 2015

I was really pleased to see Dougie Wallace get a mention in January 2015's BJP.  Not only because he is a great (in my opinion) social commentary / street photographer, but also I often hear negative opinions expressed about this kind of "in yer face" photography - including its lack of ethics, imposition on people's privacy and space, shallowness, lack of engagement, shock tactics, and so on (none of which is true, by the way).  So it's reassuring, if nothing else, to see this style of photography recognised in print.

In the article, Armstrong describes Wallace's approach: like Maciej Dakowicz in making his social commentary Cardiff After Dark, Wallace spends years, weekend after weekend, immersing himself in the environment: for Stags, Hens and Bunnies Wallace made 30 trips to Blackpool over two and a half years and Shoreditch Wild Life was shot over ten years.  And I know that Wallace is currently going backwards and forwards to Mumbai shooting for a forthcoming publication Road Wallah.  

Wallace's images are fun, garish, bright, close, revealing; I imagine that alongside the hard work, he had a lot of fun shooting them.  But the article is actually pretty poor and I'm surprised by this.  Armstrong has not written to BJP's usual standard.  For  a start, she has not even mentioned Road Wallah, yet four photographs of from this series were included in the article.  So for somebody not familiar with his work, this would be confusing.  And I really don't understand why, when writing about a contemporary photographer, would you not mention their most current work?  Street photography is such a spontaneous event, that the present is surely the most interesting point of where a photographer is?  And then a separate piece of work about differences between Knightsbridge and Glasgow (untitled) was mentioned, but some photographs from a series called The Omnibus were included in the article.  Are we supposed to make the connection?  Incidentally, that series is not called The Omnibus, it's called:
Glasgow; Second City of The Empire. On the run up to the Scottish Referendum.  Armstrong, do your research!!

And by the way, Harrods is not on the Kings Road, it's on Brompton Road.

So, poor journalism aside, how does this relate to my work and where my photography is heading?   At the moment, my street photography is totally random.  I go out as often as I can and take what I see, mainly practicing different approaches and techniques still.  And I know from looking at other street photographer's work, e.g. Pushkar Raj Sharma's Faceless series, that a good theme is a great way to build a portfolio.  And since I first looked at Cardiff After Dark, I have wanted to produce a monograph.  Trouble is, I don't have any ideas yet, well at least none that are going anywhere.   One idea I had was a series on street photography in Cumbria, the twist being the unlikely destination for street photography!  However, perhaps easier to shoot and along the same theme of drunken revelry as the work by Dakowicz and Wallace, I am also thinking about a City/Canary Wharf idea - maybe on Thursday and Friday nights.

I ordered my flash unit from Argos this weekend....


Reference List:
  • Armstrong, E. (2015) Dougie Wallace - in yer face. British Journal of Photography 161 (7831), pp.48-51 
Websites:
Bibliography:
  • Dakowicz, M. (2012) Cardiff After Dark. London: Thames & Hudson
  • Wallace, D. (2014) Stags, Hens and Bunnies. Stockport: Dewi Lewis Media
  • Wallace, D. (2014) Shoreditch Wild Life. UK: Hoxton Mini Press 

Sunday, 15 February 2015

Part Four - Reading Photographs: Introduction: Notes - Photographs not used as a means of expression or communication

The introduction to Part Four describes how photography can be thought of as a language, with its own codes and symbols that allow the artist to convey a meaning and the viewer to interpret that meaning.  Language can enable people to share an understanding, or it can also divide them.  I imagine that as with a language, differences in understanding may mean that the intended meaning can be lost.  We discussed the concept of loss of authorial control earlier in the course in Part Two in the post on non-visible themes; I made the point that the understanding of the photograph is subjective and will depend on the experiences of the viewer.  This is a natural part of the process.  So, just as in a conversation, you may say one thing, it can be interpreted as another.  And with written languages, there are more constants; we are taught to read and write at school, we can refer to dictionaries when we need to look up a meaning.  Is it the same with photography?  Are there constants in meaning that will always mean the same to the artist and the viewer?  I imagine that the scope for difference in interpretation is greater with a visual language than a written/spoken language.

The introduction asks us to think about any photographs that are not used as a means of expression or communication.  This was tough!  I ran through a mental checklist of genres and purposes of photography to try to find an answer:
  • Advertising: clearly a language (saying "buy me") designed to penetrate your subconscious
  • Documentary/reportage: communication of stories
  • Fine art: used to communicate the artist's feelings on a subject
  • Wedding photography: good question...what is it communicating?  Like holiday and party photographs - is it just a record of an occasion or are the photographs actually saying something?
  • Wildlife photography: depends - some is used to highlight eco/conservation issues - but some, including the wildlife photographs I have taken - is just used to make cute pictures - these are however - still communicating how I felt about the animal?
  • Landscape photography: could be used for a variety of means - to communicate eco/conservation issues, to be used by the artist to express something, or could be used just to make pleasing pictures
  • Still life: could be used for fine art - could be meaningful or meaningless?
  • Journalism: communication of stories
  • Portraits: will communicate the subject and the artist's emotions
  • Street photography: communication of stories.
So of the genres, they could all be communicative, or not.  It depends on the purpose of the story.  On the basis though that all photographs are telling somebody something, even if just "look at me when I was on holiday", I'm not sure there are any that are not a means of expression or communication, but clearly the levels of complexity in meaning will differ.  I quick snapshot taken in a bar does not have the same meaning as something that is complex, shocking and designed to cause a reaction, such as war porn, or a fine art photograph rich in symbology that expresses the artist's emotions.

I may come back to these notes later on in this chapter - perhaps some photographs that are not used as a means of communication or expression will come to mind.

Friday, 13 February 2015

Part Three - Putting yourself in the picture: Reflections

A very interesting part of this module!  My feet briefly touched the ground in early December and early January but other than that it was all systems go!  And I have now managed to secure a routine that is working.  On Saturdays (when I'm not in Cumbria or at an event) I practice my street photography and on Sundays I do my coursework.  During the work I am still trying to read but am constantly distracted by looking at photos on Flickr.... But, at least I know feel that I have addressed the imbalance I was feeling between academic and personal work.

All in all though, I'm really pleased; my street photography is moving and I'm loving it.  I don't think my submission for Assignment Three was great, but it was a departure from what has been a consistent approach to my street photography since October 2014.  So at least I tried something new! And I think I found out that from a personal style perspective, I prefer making colour and humour to making something dark (but the photos I took were only dark in black and white, in colour they looked funny!).

So, what else have I done during Part Three?  I have:
  • Practiced Street Photography LOTS :)  both in Japan and in London
  • Had conversations with two inspirational photographers
  • Recapped a project from last year - a revisit to a childhood memory
  • Researched Dana Popa's Not Natasha
  • Researched various street photographers that are new to me
  • Visited the Conflict.Time.Photography exhibition at the Tate Modern and participated in the group discussion afterwards
  • Posted my review on the Wildlife Photographer of the Year exhibition and understood how your state of mind can impact your enjoyment of photography
  • Learned about different approaches to self-portraiture / self-documentary / auto-biographical / introspective photography
  • Still read 0 books, although I am now halfway through The Bang Bang Club
  • Still have a stack of BJPs to read through...
Looking forward to moving on to Part Four - although there are no photos to take for Assignment Four :(

Sunday, 8 February 2015

Assignment Three - Self-portrait: Reflections

I took a gamble again with Assignment Three shooting it overseas, but on this occasion, I know I can re shoot in the UK if I have to.  The themes will be the same, but different images. Hopefully it won't come to that!  I'm just pleased that I had another opportunity to use street/travel photography themes for an assignment.

I decided on this occasion to submit five images.  Using a tightly edited and visually consistent approach worked well for Assignment Two, so I applied the same methodology.  Adding more than five images would not have added extra information to the story; it already said what I wanted to say, and adding more (as I found out) risked introducing images that were not visually consistent.

Overall, my criticism of this presentation is whether the narrative is actually about the speed of the passage of time, or the volume of work I have to do.  Hopefully, the relationship between the two elements and the fact that they have an adverse impact on each other comes through.

It was hard for me to try to shoot deliberately blurred scenes; I usually aim for absolute precision.  Although actually, apart from Image 1, which was deliberate, and 2 where I tried to be a bit sharper, the others are a bit fuzzy by happy accident.

The images I like the most are 1, 3 and 5.  I really like image 1 from Tokyo: it conveys the concept of a flood of stuff (represented by the people on the crossing) coming towards me (the daily tidal wave) and the street photography elements of the matching jumpers on the girls is an added bonus.  This was shot handheld at the slowest shutter speed I dared without blurring the background - 1/15s.  I think I managed to get sufficient softness without losing outlines.  The inclusion of the "stop hand" in the top left corner, works well as the "voice of reason" telling me to slow down, even though it's impossible.  And of course Starbucks in the background: coffee to start the day!  Image 3 from Osaka is a street photography "moment" shot through the back of the machine, creating the illusion of multiplying tasks (represented by the reflection of the bears) and the added twist of the man grabbing a toy instead of the claw.  Image 5 from the snow monkey park in Jigokudani Yaen-Koen on Christmas Day was an accident.  I didn't know I'd taken it until that evening when I was editing my 1000 shots from that day and I found it.  It was taken with a shutter speed of 1/160s so that tells you how fast they shake their heads!  I was trying at the time to create a cute monkey bathing picture, and didn't mean to take a demonic head-shaking "Exorcist" monkey.  I'm glad I didn't realise it was there on the day, as I would probably have deleted it, thinking it was too blurred.

The image I don't like is Image 4.  This was taken in Miyaji (an island near Hiroshima) on New Year's Eve at the Chinkasai Fire Festival.  It was very crowded, raining and moving very fast.  I took a lot of shots trying to get the fire action with faces coming towards me (rather than backs) - they all failed - the framing was hard with everything moving so quickly.  This image is in fact a crop (hence it is a bit grainier than the others).

Image 2 is ok; it was an easy shot being indoors and not moving (although I had had a few drinks when I took it).  This is in fact the toilet door of the bar I was in and it immediately looked like the boxes on my Outlook calendar at work on week view when I saw it.  Later I noticed the two toilet symbols, which made me laugh, as that is also a problem (as in finding time)... the gap giving me time for one lunch break during the week was an added bonus.

In terms of the Assessment Criteria, here are my thoughts:

Demonstration of technical and visual skills

If I'm honest, I don't think technically I pushed myself or tried anything new really.  I was operating within my street photography comfort zone (much easier in Asia than in UK), and didn't attempt anything tricky.  Technically the hardest shot was Image 4 because of the movement, weather and light, and having to keep up with the festival participants.  I had an opportunity to try something more creative with Image 1 (i.e. use a tripod and try to get people ghosting or maybe use a zoom burst on one person), but because I already had an image I liked, which had sufficient (very slight) blur I decided to stick with that one.  I was also under time pressure by then.

Quality of outcome

Having made the claim that I was inspired recently by two contemporary images that made the most of a monochrome, blurred technique, I don't like very much what I made.  The pictures are very dark and my interpretation of the subject matter is very dark; this is quite a contrast from my what is (now) usual colourful and comical images.  I'm pleased though that I managed to put together something that said what I wanted it to say, but I don't feel that this is representative of my own style.  I'm not sure I have a style yet, but I don't think it's going to be this.  In terms of whether it hangs together as a series, the images are connected by theme and visual consistency, but not in terms of a linkage effect between each one, as I had achieved with Assignment Two.  This series needs the text to make it hang together.

Demonstration of creativity

I never know how to answer this part; yes I've made something - I've created something from nothing and I've tried a different way of presentation.  It's unlikely to be very original - I'm sure the Shibuya Crossing has been photographed a million times already.  I suppose from the point of view that I have presented images in a different way to normal, they could be considered creative, but on retrospect, I do prefer colour street photography.  I think all the images work better individually in colour, but they sit better together as a series in black and white.  And of course I wanted to make them seem sinister, which I think the black and white helps with.  I chose the black background and white writing to the presentation format to enhance the concept of this mysterious force that controls my life.  All in all, the interpretation (metaphorical) is probably more creative than the photography itself.

Context 

My research for this assignment continued with my general and on-going street photography work (see other posts under the "Street Photography" tag) and the two photographers I mentioned.  I am looking more and more now at contemporary photographers who have made the leap that I am trying to make, i.e. to find my own style.  By looking at contemporary photographers who were recently at my stage of the journey (rather than some of the older classics e.g. Bresson), and who perhaps a few years ago were where I am now, makes the end goal seem more attainable.  I did however follow my tutor's advice, which was to try to get deeper into one subject.

Overall

Overall I am pleased to have done this work, but I don't think introspection is the way forward for me.  I am more interested in observing the world around me than looking within. 

Assignment Three - Self-portrait: Submission








Assignment Three - Self-portrait: Preparation and Execution

All images reproduced in this post have been included by kind permission of their original author.  The copyright remains with the photographer stated.  All other images are my own.

Preparation

Assignment Three asks us to keep a diary for a couple of weeks, and then to use that to develop a self-portrait drawing upon the examples studied in Part Three of this module.

My approach to this project was initially to follow the instructions and to keep a diary for a period of time.  I chose to start the diary on 25 November 2014 and had intended to update it twice a day during my train journeys to and from work.  I made single entries on 25, 27, 28, 29, and 30 November, and 1, 3, 5 and 8 December.  On 16 December I wrote a summary of my entries.  The biggest observation was that I have no available time.  I couldn't even find the time to make a diary entry every day.  For a start, I don't always get a seat on the train, and when I did, I was more inclined to look at images online than to write about myself.  I realised that I am so busy with going to work, being at work, doing my coursework, researching, and then all the boring stuff like laundry etc, that I have no time, nor the inclination for introspection.  Both at work and at home, my life seems to hurtle along at 100mph getting me through an enormous volume of work.  The days fly past in a blurred rush of confusion.  From one week to the next, I don't even remember what I've done.

To manage this, my life has become compartmentalised into little boxes on electronic calendars where everything I have agreed to do or have to do is mapped out.  My work and home calendars do in fact look very similar.  At work there are no gaps due to meetings and deadlines, at home there are no gaps due to photography commitments and traveling; the home calendar of course being a nice problem to have!  But, if I don't do the allotted thing at the right time, in the time that I have allowed, it either doesn't happen, or there is a knock-on domino effect and something else suffers.  Somewhere in the cracks, I see my poor husband, dogs, friends and rest of family.  It seems that time takes the form of an out-of-control all-consuming monster that has a mind and a course of its own that I have no choice but to keep up with; I certainly can't slow it down.  At night, I struggle to go to bed early (even though my alarm is set for a ridiculous time in the morning), as I feel robbed.  I want just a bit more time for myself before I have to sleep.  If I go to bed too early, I can't sleep anyway as my brain is still rushing.

To present this aspect of my life through photography, I wanted to make the most of a trip to Japan in December 2014 and shoot my images there and so progress the travel/street approaches I have been working on during this module.  Before leaving, I initially had in mind some ideas that I might be able to use:
  • Shinkansen to illustrate the speed at which time rushes
  • Mt Fuji to illustrate the volume of work to get through
  • Shibuya Crossing in Tokyo to depict the tidal wave of stuff coming towards me at the start of the day
  • Sushi boxes/fish crates to show the compartmentalisation of time idea - or the feeling of being stuffed in a train during the commute - or fish in a tank to show the endless movement of me and the cycles of going backwards and forwards to work
  • Monkeys relaxing to show how I feel when I finally flop on the sofa at the end of the day
 I didn't want to plan it too much though as with travel/street photography I like to let it happen to me.  This is the only part of my life where I can be right-brained and I don't want to contaminate it with too much organisation!

I was also influenced by two photographers whose work I have been following recently on Flickr, who had both managed to capture sinister and confused elements into their work that I wanted to try to reflect in this assignment: Torsten Hendricks and Gareth Bragdon.

Torsten Hendricks, a German photographer based in Hong Kong, is also a Maciej Dakowicz workshop participant, but I actually found his work on Flickr before I realised I knew him from the workshop group.  The photograph that inspired me for this piece of work is this one shot in Mongkok, Hong Kong, during the recent riots:

Mongkok (c) Torsten Hendricks

The image is part of a series called 75 Days; Hendricks writes:

"For 75 days, Hong Kong was in turmoil.  It took only 75 days to change the face of a city.  A city which was known for its apathy in regard to politics, was becoming the centre of heated discussions. It was a cradle of tension, with families becoming estranged, political discussions erupting in offices and fights breaking out in the streets.  Seventy-five days was all it took to change the image of the former so-called best police force in the world into one of the least popular police forces in the world. Cops used heavy force against citizens.  Thugs and triad members were getting into fights with protesters.

The densely populated city became a centre of politics.  While the occupied zone in Admiralty was a heavily organised zone through various political parties, the occupied area in Mongkok was shaped by the outsiders, by the minorities, by the people unable to attend universities – in short, people without any representation.  It was the libertarian area of the occupied areas in Hong Kong, and it was in Monk Kong that the most violence, the most political discussions, the most heated debates and the most resistance took place.

During these 75 days, I went out with the camera to document the various faces of the “Umbrella Movement”, the fights, the struggles and the impact of the movement onto the citizens".


I didn't know this though when I first saw the image.  I liked the blurred effect creating confusion and the feeling that something is out of control, the angry character and aggressive position, and the framing of the central character between some stationary people.  It was the sense of confusion that I wanted to incorporate into my work.  I guessed that this was handheld on a slow shutter speed; I later checked with Hendricks who confirmed that that was right, but that he also uses film (not digital) and flash.

Gareth Bragdon is an American photographer based in Edinburgh.  I also came across his work came to me through Flickr, but I also saw his work at the Fotoura Street Awards exhibition last year, where Bragdon was one of the finalists.  Through the use of a flashgun and a low position, Bragdon creates an underworld that seems bizarre, sinister and ghoulish. The photo that particularly inspired me was this one:


(c) Gareth Bragdon

This is a handheld image shot through glass.  I felt that this image personified what I wanted to say about time in that it is a monstrous concept, it causes things to get stacked up without any gaps, and there is something sinister about it.  I had originally intended to use the snow monkeys to show my eventual relaxed state, but once I'd make a mental connection between Bragdon's manic monkeys and my own monkey shots, I realised that I could use a monkey to add to the monster I wanted to create (see Image 5) and in fact provide a dramatic end to my series.

Execution

While I was away in Japan, I let my photography take its own course.  I was after all on holiday!  But as I was shooting, I was of course aware of various images that I was taking that I could use for my submission.  The only image that was deliberately shot was the Shibuya Crossing image (see Image 1).  My original intention had been to set up on a tripod and blur the movement of people, but in fact I got an image I already liked during my location scout trip.

Over the two weeks, a story unfolded that depicted the self-portrait I wanted to produce:

 Image 1
Image 2
Image 3
Rollercoaster
Image 4
Image 5
 
With the following meaning behind the images:
  • Image 1 (Shibuya Crossing, Tokyo) - tidal wave of activity about to start at the beginning of the day
  • Image 2 (Bar Buri, Ebisu, Tokyo) - compartmentalisation of time
  • Image 3 (Dotomburi, Osaka) - despite my attempts at being organised, changing and multiplying priorities
  • Rollercoaster (Fuji-Q Highland, Kawaguchiko) - time is rushing at 100mph - the day is disappearing, yet I feel stood still unable to keep up with it
  • Image 4 (Miyaji) - need to finish my tasks before the deadline - otherwise it will blow up in my face
  • Image 5 (Jigokudani Yaen-Koen) - finally, home, I can relax, but my head is still spinning.....
Once I had my story, the next thing I needed to do was to think about presentation.  I wanted to set them to a poem or literary extract, and so started looking for ideas.  I particularly liked the suggestion from a fellow student to use an extract by Dr Seuss (reference to poem not known): 

"How did it get so late, so soon? It's night before it's afternoon. December is here before it's June. My goodness how the time has flewn [sic]. How did it get so late so soon?"  

But in the end I wanted to use my own words to explain what I experience, but I decided to keep the first sentence of the quote as a title piece, as this sums up perfectly what I feel every day!

Finally, I needed to think about how I would treat the images.  They didn't look very frightening or monstrous in colour.  Plus the lighting and tones were inconsistent.  I wanted to make them look more sinister, more grainy, more like the monster I was trying to create.

I converted them all to monochrome, altered light and contrast where appropriate, and added grain.  As they were shot on different ISO speeds, I had to add more grain to some than others.  The only image I couldn't make work was the roller coaster - there was too much white in the image and I didn't like the composition.  The top diagonal white post was bothering me.  I had also tried to make a composite image for this scene that showed the car moving and the background still (instead of a panned shot) but it didn't work either - the car was too faint.  I decided in the end to leave this out as it made the series seem visually inconsistent.  It was an important part of the story, but the sensation of speed is present in Image 1 with the tidal wave and Image 4 with the notion that the thing will blow up if work isn't completed on time.

Please see my submission for the final images.
 
Websites: